142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1958248)
41. Promotion of cervical screening uptake by health visitor follow-up of women who repeatedly failed to attend.
Campbell H; MacDonald S; McKiernan M
J Public Health Med; 1996 Mar; 18(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 8785082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.
Majeed FA; Cook DG; Anderson HR; Hilton S; Bunn S; Stones C
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6939):1272-6. PubMed ID: 8205021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Evaluation of a pilot study for breast and cervical cancer screening with Bradford's minority ethnic women; a community development approach, 1991-93.
Kernohan EE
Br J Cancer Suppl; 1996 Sep; 29():S42-6. PubMed ID: 8782798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quinquennial cervical smears: every woman's right and every general practitioner's responsibility.
Standing P; Mercer S
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Oct; 289(6449):883-6. PubMed ID: 6434128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Health education in a computer-managed cervical screening programme.
Eardley A; Elkind A; Spencer B; Haran D; Hobbs P; McGuinness H
Health Educ J; 1988; 47(2-3):43-7. PubMed ID: 10292169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Women's views of the cervical smear test: implications for nursing practice--women who have had a smear test.
McKie L
J Adv Nurs; 1993 Aug; 18(8):1228-34. PubMed ID: 8376661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Using entertainment-education to promote cervical cancer screening in Thai women.
Love GD; Tanjasiri SP
J Cancer Educ; 2012 Jun; 27(3):585-90. PubMed ID: 22581487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The uptake of cervical cancer screening by renal transplant recipients.
Courtney AE; Leonard N; O'Neill CJ; McNamee PT; Maxwell AP
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2009 Feb; 24(2):647-52. PubMed ID: 18952575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Bridging cultures through the development of a cervical cancer screening video for Cambodian women in the United States.
Mahloch J; Jackson JC; Chitnarong K; Sam R; Ngo LS; Taylor VM
J Cancer Educ; 1999; 14(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 10397488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Cervical cancer educational pamphlets: Do they miss the mark for Mexican immigrant women's needs?
Hunter JL
Cancer Control; 2005 Nov; 12 Suppl 2():42-50. PubMed ID: 16327750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. An examination of the role of opportunistic smear taking in the NHS cervical screening programme using data from the CSEU cervical screening cohort study.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Swerdlow AJ
BJOG; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 17803716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Psychological burden of testing positive for high-risk human papillomavirus on women with atypical cervical cytology: a prospective study.
Kwan TT; Cheung AN; Lo SS; Lee PW; Tam KF; Chan KK; Ngan HY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2011 May; 90(5):445-51. PubMed ID: 21306349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Attitudes and factors affecting acceptability of self-administered cervicovaginal sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping as an alternative to Pap testing among multiethnic Malaysian women.
Ma'som M; Bhoo-Pathy N; Nasir NH; Bellinson J; Subramaniam S; Ma Y; Yap SH; Goh PP; Gravitt P; Woo YL
BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011022. PubMed ID: 27491667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Why women still die from cervical cancer.
Masood S
J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 9379163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The use of Pap smear and its influencing factors among women with disabilities in Taiwan.
Huang KH; Tsai WC; Kung PT
Res Dev Disabil; 2012; 33(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 22100350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Are women sufficiently well informed to provide valid consent for the cervical smear test?
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 2000 Jun; 11(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 10877276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. An analysis of resources for indigenous women in NSW about cervical screening.
Jackson LR; Ward JE
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2000 Jun; 24(3):327-30. PubMed ID: 10937414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Is the provision of information leaflets before colposcopy beneficial? A prospective randomised study.
Howells RE; Dunn PD; Isasi T; Chenoy R; Calvert E; Jones PW; Shroff JF; Redman CW
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jun; 106(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 10426608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Young people's knowledge of the cervical smear test.
Charlton A
Soc Sci Med; 1983; 17(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 6844956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
