232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19582528)
1. Tantalum components in difficult acetabular revisions.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):454-8. PubMed ID: 19582528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup.
Del Gaizo DJ; Kancherla V; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 22090355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.
Lachiewicz PF; O'Dell JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):336-342. PubMed ID: 29529665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durability of second-generation extensively porous-coated stems in patients age 50 and younger.
Moyer JA; Metz CM; Callaghan JJ; Hennessy DW; Liu SS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 19727992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do tantalum and titanium cups show similar results in revision hip arthroplasty?
Jafari SM; Bender B; Coyle C; Parvizi J; Sharkey PF; Hozack WJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 19809857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects.
Batuyong ED; Brock HS; Thiruvengadam N; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Huddleston JI
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1318-22. PubMed ID: 24405625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do tantalum components provide adequate primary fixation in all acetabular revisions?
Flecher X; Paprosky W; Grillo JC; Aubaniac JM; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 May; 96(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 20488141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second-generation modular acetabular components provide fixation at 10 to 16 years.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):366-72. PubMed ID: 21691908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of isolated acetabular revision.
Lawless BM; Healy WL; Sharma S; Iorio R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 19789935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of combined porous tantalum augments and titanium-coated cups for Paprosky type III bone defects in acetabular revision.
Xiao Q; Xu B; Zhou K; Ling T; Yuan M; Pei F; Zhou Z
Int Orthop; 2021 Jul; 45(7):1699-1706. PubMed ID: 34019127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical technique: a cup-in-cup technique to restore offset in severe protrusio acetabular defects.
Blumenfeld TJ; Bargar WL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 21915769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
García-Rey E; Madero R; García-Cimbrelo E
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?
Hooper N; Sargeant H; Frampton C; Hooper G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3806-10. PubMed ID: 26373851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical technique: Porous tantalum reconstruction for destructive nonprimary periacetabular tumors.
Khan FA; Rose PS; Yanagisawa M; Lewallen DG; Sim FH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 21989784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.
Long WT; Dastane M; Harris MJ; Wan Z; Dorr LD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):400-5. PubMed ID: 19727987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.
Moličnik A; Hanc M; Rečnik G; Krajnc Z; Rupreht M; Fokter SK
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2014 Aug; 24(6):911-7. PubMed ID: 24241214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
