232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19582528)
21. Medial protrusio technique for placement of a porous-coated, hemispherical acetabular component without cement in a total hip arthroplasty in patients who have acetabular dysplasia.
Dorr LD; Tawakkol S; Moorthy M; Long W; Wan Z
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 9973058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.
Civinini R; Carulli C; Matassi F; Nistri L; Innocenti M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Dec; 470(12):3542-8. PubMed ID: 22700131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. A prospective study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.
Xenos JS; Callaghan JJ; Heekin RD; Hopkinson WJ; Savory CG; Moore MS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 9973057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Stability of the Porous Tantalum Components Used in Revision THA to Treat Severe Acetabular Defects: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study.
Solomon LB; Abrahams JM; Callary SA; Howie DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(22):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 30480597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Outcomes of Revisions of the Acetabular Component of THA with Paprosky Type 3a and 3b Defects Using Tantalum Trabecular Metal Implants 2-10 Years Postoperatively].
Musil D; Trnka T; Klouda J; PertlÍČek J; Held M; StehlÍk J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2020; 87(6):387-395. PubMed ID: 33408003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High survival of uncemented proximally porous-coated titanium alloy femoral stems in osteoporotic bone.
Meding JB; Galley MR; Ritter MA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 19727996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Acetabular component revision using a porous tantalum biomaterial: a case series.
Malkani AL; Price MR; Crawford CH; Baker DL
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1068-73. PubMed ID: 18823745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.
Paxton ES; Keeney JA; Maloney WJ; Clohisy JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):483-93. PubMed ID: 20922585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The medium term outcome of the Omnifit constrained acetabular cup.
Bigsby E; Whitehouse MR; Bannister GC; Blom AW
Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 23100150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular shells in revision total hip replacement: two to four year clinical and radiographic results.
Kim WY; Greidanus NV; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Garbuz DS
Hip Int; 2008; 18(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18645969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Salvage of failed acetabular cages by nonbuttressed trabecular metal cups.
Kosashvili Y; Safir O; Backstein D; Lakstein D; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):466-71. PubMed ID: 19543864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.
Moskal JT; Higgins ME; Shen J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 466(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 18264858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis.
Tanzer M; Drucker D; Jasty M; McDonald M; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Aug; 74(7):987-94. PubMed ID: 1522106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study.
de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Is there a risk in placing a ceramic head on a previously implanted trunion?
Hannouche D; Delambre J; Zadegan F; Sedel L; Nizard R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 468(12):3322-7. PubMed ID: 20700672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Paprosky Type III Acetabular Defect With Structural Allograft and Tantalum Trabecular Metal Acetabular Cup.
Chang CH; Hu CC; Chen CC; Mahajan J; Chang Y; Shih HN; Kwon YM
Orthopedics; 2018 Nov; 41(6):e861-e867. PubMed ID: 30371922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.
van Egmond N; De Kam DC; Gardeniers JW; Schreurs BW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):562-73. PubMed ID: 20931308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Acetabular revision with a modular anti-protrusio acetabular component.
Peters CL; Miller M; Erickson J; Hall P; Samuelson K
J Arthroplasty; 2004 Oct; 19(7 Suppl 2):67-72. PubMed ID: 15457421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
