314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19582820)
1. Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications.
Karanlik H; Kurul S
J Surg Oncol; 2009 Sep; 100(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 19582820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Di Carlo I; Barbagallo F; Toro A; Sofia M; Lombardo R; Cordio S
Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. PubMed ID: 15889215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. External jugular vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in cancer patients: A potentially useful alternative.
Povoski SP
World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 2():7. PubMed ID: 15090065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases.
Chang HM; Hsieh CB; Hsieh HF; Chen TW; Chen CJ; Chan DC; Yu JC; Liu YC; Shen KL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Feb; 32(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 16289481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein
Iorio O; Gazzanelli S; D'Ermo G; Pezzolla A; Gurrado A; Testini M; De Toma G; Cavallaro G
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
Sarzo G; Finco C; Parise P; Savastano S; Vecchiato M; Degregori S; Merigliano S
Chir Ital; 2004; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External jugular Groshong catheter is associated with fewer complications than a subclavian Argyle catheter.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Horie T; Furihata M; Nakagawa A; Kubota K
Eur Surg Res; 2008; 40(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 17998779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computed tomography (CT) venography using a multidetector CT prior to the percutaneous external jugular vein approach for an implantable venous-access port.
Kato K; Taniguchi M; Iwasaki Y; Sasahara K; Nagase A; Onodera K; Matsuda M; Higuchi M; Kobashi Y; Furukawa H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):1391-7. PubMed ID: 24306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experience of anesthesiologists with percutaneous nonangiographic venous access.
Chen PT; Sung CS; Wang CC; Chan KH; Chang WK; Hsu WH
J Clin Anesth; 2007 Dec; 19(8):609-15. PubMed ID: 18083475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel "shrug technique" for totally implantable venous access devices via the external jugular vein: A consecutive series of 254 patients.
Kagawa T; Ueyama S; Kobayashi T; Okabayashi H; Kuroda S; Fujiwara T
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 115(3):291-295. PubMed ID: 27813159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications.
Di Carlo I; Pulvirenti E; Mannino M; Toro A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):1649-56. PubMed ID: 20204533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External jugular venous catheterization with a Groshong catheter for central venous access.
Ishizuka M; Nagata H; Takagi K; Kubota K
J Surg Oncol; 2008 Jul; 98(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 18452215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
Jablon LK; Ugolini KR; Nahmias NC
Am J Surg; 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16769277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Routine chest X-ray is not mandatory after fluoroscopy-guided totally implantable venous access device insertion.
Thomopoulos T; Meyer J; Staszewicz W; Bagetakos I; Scheffler M; Lomessy A; Toso C; Becker CD; Morel P
Ann Vasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 28(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 24360633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Totally implantable venous access systems. Analysis of complications].
D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G; Caramitti A; Aurello P; Lauro S; Bordin F; Della Casa U
Minerva Chir; 1997; 52(7-8):937-42. PubMed ID: 9411296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal jugular versus subclavian vein catheterization for central venous catheterization in orthotopic liver transplantation.
Torgay A; Pirat A; Candan S; Zeyneloglu P; Arslan G; Haberal M
Transplant Proc; 2005 Sep; 37(7):3171-3. PubMed ID: 16213340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subclavian vein stenosis following totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant by percutaneous approach. Case report.
Di Carlo I; Fasone MA; Toro A; Castello G; Sparatore F; Cordio S
G Chir; 2004; 25(11-12):417-9. PubMed ID: 15803820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
Davis SJ; Thompson JS; Edney JA
Am Surg; 1984 Dec; 50(12):673-6. PubMed ID: 6508024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
