BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19583538)

  • 1. Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty - review of comparative clinical and basic science studies.
    Marker DR; Strimbu K; McGrath MS; Zywiel MG; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 19583538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes.
    Fowble VA; dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19583535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes.
    Zywiel MG; Marker DR; McGrath MS; Delanois RE; Mont MA
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19583537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The early results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing - a prospective study at a minimum two-year follow-up.
    Bergeron SG; Desy NM; Nikolaou VS; Debiparshad K; Antoniou J
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 19583540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resurfacing arthroplasty for patients with osteonecrosis.
    Stulberg BN; Fitts SM; Zadzilka JD; Trier K
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 19583542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hang JR; Miller LN; Graves SE; Davidson DC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93(24):2287-93. PubMed ID: 22258775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing - a clinical study.
    Le Duff MJ; Wisk LE; Amstutz HC
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 19583550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Canadian academic experience with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
    O'Neill M; Beaule PE; Bin Nasser A; Garbuz D; Lavigne M; Duncan C; Kim PR; Schemitsch E
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 19583539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.
    Marshall DA; Pykerman K; Werle J; Lorenzetti D; Wasylak T; Noseworthy T; Dick DA; O'Connor G; Sundaram A; Heintzbergen S; Frank C
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jul; 472(7):2217-30. PubMed ID: 24700446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: could we achieve better function?
    Newman MA; Barker KL; Pandit H; Murray DW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 89(4):660-6. PubMed ID: 18373996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.
    Amanatullah DF; Cheung Y; Di Cesare PE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2010 Apr; 41(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 20399365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes with cementless total hip resurfacing: 5 year follow-up.
    Radtke K; Ettinger M; Heidgen H; Floerkemeier T; Noll Y; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G
    Technol Health Care; 2014 Jan; 22(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 24898864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of functional results of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement: a review of the literature.
    Shimmin AJ; Baré JV
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Apr; 42(2):143-51, vii. PubMed ID: 21435490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resurfacing for Perthes disease: an alternative to standard hip arthroplasty.
    Boyd HS; Ulrich SD; Seyler TM; Marulanda GA; Mont MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():80-5. PubMed ID: 17693876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing.
    Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of hip resurfacing in a professional dancer: a case report.
    Dunleavy K
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2012 Feb; 28(2):142-60. PubMed ID: 21801098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trial.
    Howie DW; McGee MA; Costi K; Graves SE
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):195-201, ix. PubMed ID: 15833457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early results of total hip replacement with the Metasul metal-on-metal cementless prosthesis.
    Vigler M; Greental A; Kaminsky AJ; Shauer L; Salai M; Soudry M
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 20345355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Silva M; Lee KH; Heisel C; Dela Rosa MA; Schmalzried TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 14711943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.