784 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19583762)
1. Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing systems.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Li J; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19583762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.
Beuer F; Aggstaller H; Edelhoff D; Gernet W; Sorensen J
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18620749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F
J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Brinkmann H; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 37(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 20059649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):378-84. PubMed ID: 19961996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Att W; Komine F; Gerds T; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses.
Reich S; Kappe K; Teschner H; Schmitt J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Dec; 116(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 19049530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy.
Kohorst P; Junghanns J; Dittmer MP; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):527-36. PubMed ID: 20495937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and internal fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study.
Büchi DL; Ebler S; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Quintessence Int; 2014; 45(10):837-46. PubMed ID: 25126636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system.
Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Spiekermann H; Anusavice KJ
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(4):367-74. PubMed ID: 11504436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs.
Gonzalo E; Suárez MJ; Serrano B; Lozano JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 19639075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems.
Reich S; Wichmann M; Nkenke E; Proeschel P
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Apr; 113(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 15819826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal fit of posterior three-unit fixed zirconia dental prostheses fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems and materials.
Schönberger J; Erdelt KJ; Bäumer D; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Nov; 21(8):2629-2635. PubMed ID: 28160108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings--a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations.
Beuer F; Schweiger J; Eichberger M; Kappert HF; Gernet W; Edelhoff D
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 18620748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of preliminary damage on the load-bearing capacity of zirconia fixed dental prostheses.
Kohorst P; Butzheinen LO; Dittmer MP; Heuer W; Borchers L; Stiesch M
J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):606-13. PubMed ID: 20723012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
