BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19584067)

  • 1. Identification of distant family relationships.
    Skare Ø; Sheehan N; Egeland T
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2376-82. PubMed ID: 19584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On identification problems requiring linked autosomal markers.
    Egeland T; Sheehan N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19083824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
    Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structured incorporation of prior information in relationship identification problems.
    Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Jul; 71(Pt 4):501-18. PubMed ID: 17233753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of estimated evolutionary strength at the codon level improves the prediction of disease-related protein mutations in humans.
    Capriotti E; Arbiza L; Casadio R; Dopazo J; Dopazo H; Marti-Renom MA
    Hum Mutat; 2008 Jan; 29(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 17935148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficient computation of close lower and upper bounds on the minimum number of recombinations in biological sequence evolution.
    Song YS; Wu Y; Gusfield D
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i413-22. PubMed ID: 15961486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Error detection in SNP data by considering the likelihood of recombinational history implied by three-site combinations.
    Toleno DM; Morrell PL; Clegg MT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(14):1807-14. PubMed ID: 17510172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of a claimed distant relationship in a deficient pedigree using high density SNP data.
    Lareu MV; García-Magariños M; Phillips C; Quintela I; Carracedo A; Salas A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 21868300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SNP-VISTA: an interactive SNP visualization tool.
    Shah N; Teplitsky MV; Minovitsky S; Pennacchio LA; Hugenholtz P; Hamann B; Dubchak IL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():292. PubMed ID: 16336665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving estimates of genetic maps: a maximum likelihood approach.
    Stewart WC; Thompson EA
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16984314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal peeling order for pedigrees with incomplete genotypic information.
    Belonogova NM; Axenovich TI
    Comput Biol Chem; 2007 Jun; 31(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 17500037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clustering algorithm using DNA marker information for sub-pedigree reconstruction.
    Cowell RG; Mostad P
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Nov; 48(6):1239-48. PubMed ID: 14640266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An efficient comprehensive search algorithm for tagSNP selection using linkage disequilibrium criteria.
    Qin ZS; Gopalakrishnan S; Abecasis GR
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 16269414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. HAPLORE: a program for haplotype reconstruction in general pedigrees without recombination.
    Zhang K; Sun F; Zhao H
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 21(1):90-103. PubMed ID: 15231536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy, efficiency and robustness of four algorithms allowing full sibship reconstruction from DNA marker data.
    Butler K; Field C; Herbinger CM; Smith BR
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Jun; 13(6):1589-600. PubMed ID: 15140101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Zero-recombinant haplotyping: applications to fine mapping using SNPs.
    O'Connell JR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S64-70. PubMed ID: 11055372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A whole genome long-range haplotype (WGLRH) test for detecting imprints of positive selection in human populations.
    Zhang C; Bailey DK; Awad T; Liu G; Xing G; Cao M; Valmeekam V; Retief J; Matsuzaki H; Taub M; Seielstad M; Kennedy GC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(17):2122-8. PubMed ID: 16845142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Issues in association mapping with high-density SNP data and diverse family structures.
    Bickeböller H; Goddard KA; Igo RP; Kraft P; Lozano JP; Pankratz N; Balavarca Y; Bardel C; Charoen P; Croiseau P; Guo CY; Joo J; Köhler K; Madsen A; Malzahn D; Monsees G; Sohns M; Ye Z
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007; 31 Suppl 1():S22-33. PubMed ID: 18046763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating haplotype frequencies and standard errors for multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Li SS; Khalid N; Carlson C; Zhao LP
    Biostatistics; 2003 Oct; 4(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 14557108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.