BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19584374)

  • 1. Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.
    Davenport DL; Holsapple CW; Conigliaro J
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 19584374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.
    Cima RR; Lackore KA; Nehring SA; Cassivi SD; Donohue JH; Deschamps C; Vansuch M; Naessens JM
    Surgery; 2011 Nov; 150(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 21875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Hutter MM; Rowell KS; Devaney LA; Sokal SM; Warshaw AL; Abbott WM; Hodin RA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing a NSQIP module to measure outcomes in children's surgical care: opportunity and challenge.
    Dillon P; Hammermeister K; Morrato E; Kempe A; Oldham K; Moss L; Marchildon M; Ziegler M; Steeger J; Rowell K; Shiloach M; Henderson W
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2008 May; 17(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18395663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Daley J; Jonasson O; Jones RS; Campbell DA; Fink AS; Mentzer RM; Neumayer L; Hammermeister K; Mosca C; Healey N;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.
    Rowell KS; Turrentine FE; Hutter MM; Khuri SF; Henderson WG
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 17544087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: general surgical operations in women.
    Fink AS; Hutter MM; Campbell DC; Henderson WG; Mosca C; Khuri SF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 17544071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program.
    Davis CL; Pierce JR; Henderson W; Spencer CD; Tyler C; Langberg R; Swafford J; Felan GS; Kearns MA; Booker B
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 204(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17382213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship of processes and structures of care in general surgery to postoperative outcomes: a descriptive analysis.
    Main DS; Henderson WG; Pratte K; Cavender TA; Schifftner TL; Kinney A; Stoner T; Steiner JF; Fink AS; Khuri SF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1157-65. PubMed ID: 17544074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based outcome data after hernia surgery: a possible role for the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Fink AS
    Am J Surg; 2004 Dec; 188(6A Suppl):30S-34S. PubMed ID: 15610890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.
    Hanauer DA; Englesbe MJ; Cowan JA; Campbell DA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Jan; 208(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19228500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.
    Regenbogen SE; Ehrenfeld JM; Lipsitz SR; Greenberg CC; Hutter MM; Gawande AA
    Arch Surg; 2009 Jan; 144(1):30-6; discussion 37. PubMed ID: 19153322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative to improve surgical outcomes.
    Guillamondegui OD; Gunter OL; Hines L; Martin BJ; Gibson W; Clarke PC; Cecil WT; Cofer JB
    J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Apr; 214(4):709-14; discussion 714-6. PubMed ID: 22265639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fifteen years of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in review.
    Itani KM
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S9-S18. PubMed ID: 19874939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: critical steps to success for surgeons and hospitals.
    Velanovich V; Rubinfeld I; Patton JH; Ritz J; Jordan J; Dulchavsky S
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 19584373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery.
    Atherly A; Fink AS; Campbell DC; Mentzer RM; Henderson W; Khuri S; Culler SD
    Am J Surg; 2004 Nov; 188(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 15546571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjusted or unadjusted outcomes.
    Fink AS
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S28-35. PubMed ID: 19874931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
    Hall BL; Hamilton BH; Richards K; Bilimoria KY; Cohen ME; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 19644350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.