These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19585005)

  • 1. A dependency graph approach for the analysis of differential gene expression profiles.
    Bernthaler A; Mühlberger I; Fechete R; Perco P; Lukas A; Mayer B
    Mol Biosyst; 2009 Dec; 5(12):1720-31. PubMed ID: 19585005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linking transcriptomic and proteomic data on the level of protein interaction networks.
    Perco P; Mühlberger I; Mayer G; Oberbauer R; Lukas A; Mayer B
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Jun; 31(11):1780-9. PubMed ID: 20432478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enrichment analysis in high-throughput genomics - accounting for dependency in the NULL.
    Gold DL; Coombes KR; Wang J; Mallick B
    Brief Bioinform; 2007 Mar; 8(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 17077137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reverse engineering of regulatory networks in human B cells.
    Basso K; Margolin AA; Stolovitzky G; Klein U; Dalla-Favera R; Califano A
    Nat Genet; 2005 Apr; 37(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 15778709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitting a geometric graph to a protein-protein interaction network.
    Higham DJ; Rasajski M; Przulj N
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 18344248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DEEP--a tool for differential expression effector prediction.
    Degenhardt J; Haubrock M; Dönitz J; Wingender E; Crass T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W619-24. PubMed ID: 17584786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Transcriptomes for serial analysis of gene expression].
    Marti J; Piquemal D; Manchon L; Commes T
    J Soc Biol; 2002; 196(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 12645300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An efficient algorithm for detecting frequent subgraphs in biological networks.
    Koyutürk M; Grama A; Szpankowski W
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 20 Suppl 1():i200-7. PubMed ID: 15262800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network.
    Rhodes DR; Tomlins SA; Varambally S; Mahavisno V; Barrette T; Kalyana-Sundaram S; Ghosh D; Pandey A; Chinnaiyan AM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):951-9. PubMed ID: 16082366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uncharacterized/hypothetical proteins in biomedical 'omics' experiments: is novelty being swept under the carpet?
    Pawłowski K
    Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2008 Jul; 7(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18641417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Supervised enzyme network inference from the integration of genomic data and chemical information.
    Yamanishi Y; Vert JP; Kanehisa M
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():i468-77. PubMed ID: 15961492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting functional modules in the yeast protein-protein interaction network.
    Chen J; Yuan B
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2283-90. PubMed ID: 16837529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different gene-expression profiles for the poorly differentiated carcinoma and the highly differentiated papillary adenocarcinoma in mammary glands support distinct metabolic pathways.
    Eilon T; Barash I
    BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():270. PubMed ID: 18811984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ranking genes by their co-expression to subsets of pathway members.
    Adler P; Peterson H; Agius P; Reimand J; Vilo J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Mar; 1158():1-13. PubMed ID: 19348627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Where are we in genomics?
    Hocquette JF
    J Physiol Pharmacol; 2005 Jun; 56 Suppl 3():37-70. PubMed ID: 16077195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The identification of similarities between biological networks: application to the metabolome and interactome.
    Cootes AP; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    J Mol Biol; 2007 Jun; 369(4):1126-39. PubMed ID: 17466331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Gibbs sampler for the identification of gene expression and network connectivity consistency.
    Brynildsen MP; Tran LM; Liao JC
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Dec; 22(24):3040-6. PubMed ID: 17060361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decoding genes with coexpression networks and metabolomics - 'majority report by precogs'.
    Saito K; Hirai MY; Yonekura-Sakakibara K
    Trends Plant Sci; 2008 Jan; 13(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18160330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraction of correlated gene clusters by multiple graph comparison.
    Nakaya A; Goto S; Kanehisa M
    Genome Inform; 2001; 12():44-53. PubMed ID: 11791223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative genome profiling across subtypes of low-grade B-cell lymphoma identifies type-specific and common aberrations that target genes with a role in B-cell neoplasia.
    Ferreira BI; García JF; Suela J; Mollejo M; Camacho FI; Carro A; Montes S; Piris MA; Cigudosa JC
    Haematologica; 2008 May; 93(5):670-9. PubMed ID: 18367492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.