286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19585159)
1. Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.
Finn MA; Brodke DS; Daubs M; Patel A; Bachus KN
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1520-7. PubMed ID: 19585159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
Shimamoto N; Cunningham BW; Dmitriev AE; Minami A; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superior-segment Bilateral Facet Violation in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation, Part III: A Biomechanical Study of Severe Violation.
Xu Y; Le X; Zhang Q; Kuai S; Leng H; Duan F; Shi Z; Liu B; He D; Lang Z; Wu J; Wang L; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E508-E514. PubMed ID: 31770344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.
Gédet P; Haschtmann D; Thistlethwaite PA; Ferguson SJ
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 19565278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion.
Lee MJ; Dumonski M; Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov; 36(23):1932-9. PubMed ID: 21289581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
Healy AT; Sundar SJ; Cardenas RJ; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Francis TB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.
Wojewnik B; Ghanayem AJ; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Potluri T; Havey RM; Zelenakova J; Patel AA; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
Eur Spine J; 2013 Jan; 22(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 22850940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of a low-profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device at the index level or adjacent to plated fusion.
Balaram AK; Ghanayem AJ; OʼLeary PT; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E763-9. PubMed ID: 24732831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of noncontiguous cervical disc arthroplasty and noncontiguous cervical discectomy and fusion in the treatment of noncontinuous cervical degenerative disc disease: a finite element analysis.
Sun X; Sun S; Zhang T; Kong C; Wang W; Lu S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 32005193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Range of motion change after cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C and prestige artificial discs compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Chang UK; Kim DH; Lee MC; Willenberg R; Kim SH; Lim J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Jul; 7(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 17633486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.
Schmoelz W; Onder U; Martin A; von Strempel A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
Hua W; Zhi J; Wang B; Ke W; Sun W; Yang S; Li L; Yang C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
