BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19586238)

  • 1. Source entitativity and the elaboration of persuasive messages: the roles of perceived efficacy and message discrepancy.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jul; 97(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 19586238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Fabrigar LR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Apr; 34(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18340037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.
    Rydell RJ; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 15574665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source expertise and persuasion: the effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Habashi MM; Evans AT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Jan; 38(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 21878613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic.
    Barden J; Petty RE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Sep; 95(3):489-509. PubMed ID: 18729690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: the role of group entitativity.
    Rydell RJ; Hugenberg K; Ray D; Mackie DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 17363758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mood and processing of proattitudinal and counterattitudinal messages.
    Ziegler R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):482-95. PubMed ID: 23436770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systematic and heuristic processing of majority and minority-endorsed messages: the effects of varying outcome relevance and levels of orientation on attitude and message processing.
    Martin R; Hewstone M; Martin PY
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 17178929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assimilation and contrast in persuasion: the effects of source credibility in multiple message situations.
    Tormala ZL; Clarkson JJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Apr; 33(4):559-71. PubMed ID: 17363764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minority versus majority influence and uncertainty orientation: processing persuasive messages on the basis of situational expectancies.
    Shuper PA; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):127-47. PubMed ID: 15074502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promoting exercise behaviour: an integration of persuasion theories and the theory of planned behaviour.
    Jones LW; Sinclair RC; Rhodes RE; Courneya KS
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):505-21. PubMed ID: 15509358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.
    Lee AY; Aaker JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 14769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Entitativity and intergroup bias: How belonging to a cohesive group allows people to express their prejudices.
    Effron DA; Knowles ED
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Feb; 108(2):234-53. PubMed ID: 25603374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relevance override: on the reduced impact of "cues" under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies.
    Pierro A; Mannetti L; Kruglanski AW; Sleeth-Keppler D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):251-64. PubMed ID: 14769082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies between explicit and implicit self-concepts: Consequences for information processing.
    Briñol P; Petty RE; Wheeler SC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):154-70. PubMed ID: 16834486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The perceived informational basis of attitudes: implications for subjective ambivalence.
    Tormala ZL; DeSensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Feb; 34(2):275-87. PubMed ID: 18212335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pursuit of self-interest: self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion.
    Darke PR; Chaiken S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2005 Dec; 89(6):864-83. PubMed ID: 16393021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.