108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19586254)
1. Univariate and default standard unit biases in estimation of body weight and caloric content.
Geier AB; Rozin P
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Jun; 15(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19586254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Area judgment from width and height information: the case of the rectangle.
Rulence-Paques P; Mullet E
J Exp Child Psychol; 1998 Apr; 69(1):22-48. PubMed ID: 9584069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Judgments of body weight based on food intake: a pervasive cognitive bias among restrained eaters.
Vartanian LR; Herman CP; Polivy J
Int J Eat Disord; 2008 Jan; 41(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 17634967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judging female figures: a new methodological approach to male attractiveness judgments of female waist-to-hip ratio.
Schützwohl A
Biol Psychol; 2006 Feb; 71(2):223-9. PubMed ID: 16019126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How do body-dissatisfied and body-satisfied males and females judge the size of thin female celebrities?
Willinge A; Touyz S; Charles M
Int J Eat Disord; 2006 Nov; 39(7):576-82. PubMed ID: 16878299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Body weight and body image among college women: perception, cognition, and affect.
Cash TF; Green GK
J Pers Assess; 1986; 50(2):290-301. PubMed ID: 3761129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of estimations of body-frame size as a function of sex and actual frame size.
Hearns JF; Broida JP; Gayton WF
Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Feb; 66(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 3362633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Eating behavior in response to food-cue exposure: examining the cue-reactivity and counteractive-control models.
Coelho JS; Jansen A; Roefs A; Nederkoorn C
Psychol Addict Behav; 2009 Mar; 23(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 19290697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-fat dairy intake and body weight and composition changes in college students.
Poddar KH; Hosig KW; Nickols-Richardson SM; Anderson ES; Herbert WG; Duncan SE
J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Aug; 109(8):1433-8. PubMed ID: 19631052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of prior exposure to stimulus material on identification of speakers' sex, height, and weight.
Coleman RO; Lass NJ
Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):619-22. PubMed ID: 7255071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adults' perception of children's height and reaching capability.
Cordovil R; Barreiros J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 20472225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of attentional training on body dissatisfaction and dietary restriction.
Smith E; Rieger E
Eur Eat Disord Rev; 2009 May; 17(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 19338028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carrying the height of the world on your ankles: encumbering observers reduces estimates of how high an actor can jump.
Ramenzoni VC; Riley MA; Shockley K; Davis T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1487-95. PubMed ID: 18609383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tuning in to another person's action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics.
Ramenzoni V; Riley MA; Davis T; Shockley K; Armstrong R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 18665735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Estimation of the caloric need with the help of a graph].
Makosch G; Hövels O; Bergmann KE
Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1982 Aug; 130(8):597-600. PubMed ID: 7133012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Meniscal allograft size can be predicted by height, weight, and gender.
Van Thiel GS; Verma N; Yanke A; Basu S; Farr J; Cole B
Arthroscopy; 2009 Jul; 25(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 19560635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct-comparison judgments: when and why above- and below-average effects reverse.
Windschitl PD; Conybeare D; Krizan Z
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Feb; 137(1):182-200. PubMed ID: 18248136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Social likeability, conformity, and body talk: Does fat talk have a normative rival in female body image conversations?
Tompkins KB; Martz DM; Rocheleau CA; Bazzini DG
Body Image; 2009 Sep; 6(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 19674946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The judgment of body landmark heights.
Nash H
Genet Psychol Monogr; 1969 May; 79(2):251-96. PubMed ID: 5784141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of need for cognition with judgments of height, weight, and body fat covariation.
Pryor PL; McGahan JR; McDougal B; Haire SM; Marashi H
Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1147-57. PubMed ID: 11272755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
