These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19586270)

  • 1. Predicting category intuitiveness with the rational model, the simplicity model, and the generalized context model.
    Pothos EM; Bailey TM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):1062-80. PubMed ID: 19586270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks.
    Pothos EM; Perlman A; Bailey TM; Kurtz K; Edwards DJ; Hines P; McDonnell JV
    Cognition; 2011 Oct; 121(1):83-100. PubMed ID: 21733497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach.
    Pothos EM; Close J
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):581-602. PubMed ID: 18083157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recency effects as a window to generalization: separating decisional and perceptual sequential effects in category learning.
    Jones M; Love BC; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):316-32. PubMed ID: 16569149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Classifying partial exemplars: seeing less and learning more.
    Taylor EG; Ross BH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1374-80. PubMed ID: 19686031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervised versus unsupervised categorization: two sides of the same coin?
    Pothos EM; Edwards DJ; Perlman A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1692-713. PubMed ID: 21812708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unsupervised categorization and category learning.
    Pothos EM; Chater N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 May; 58(4):733-52. PubMed ID: 16104104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thirty-something categorization results explained: selective attention, eyetracking, and models of category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):811-29. PubMed ID: 16248736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.
    Voorspoels W; Storms G; Vanpaemel W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1721-39. PubMed ID: 22537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prototypes in category learning: the effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity.
    Minda JP; Smith JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):775-99. PubMed ID: 11394680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Features of graded category structure: Generalizing the family resemblance and polymorphous concept models.
    Dry MJ; Storms G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Mar; 133(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 20053389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modulating influence of category size on the classification of exception patterns.
    Homa D; Proulx MJ; Blair M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):425-43. PubMed ID: 17853225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.
    Verheyen S; De Deyne S; Dry MJ; Storms G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1515-31. PubMed ID: 21767056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The GIST of concepts.
    Vigo R
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):138-62. PubMed ID: 23891825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term memory for categories and concepts in horses (Equus caballus).
    Hanggi EB; Ingersoll JF
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):451-62. PubMed ID: 19148689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exemplar and prototype models revisited: response strategies, selective attention, and stimulus generalization.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):924-40. PubMed ID: 12219799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond nonutilization: irrelevant cues can gate learning in probabilistic categorization.
    Little DR; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):530-50. PubMed ID: 19331506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prototype and exemplar accounts of category learning and attentional allocation: a reassessment.
    Zaki SR; Nosofsky RM; Stanton RD; Cohen AL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1160-73. PubMed ID: 14622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The representation of perceived shape similarity and its role for category learning in monkeys: a modeling study.
    Op de Beeck HP; Wagemans J; Vogels R
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):598-610. PubMed ID: 18199467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison processes in category learning: from theory to behavior.
    Hammer R; Bar-Hillel A; Hertz T; Weinshall D; Hochstein S
    Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1225():102-18. PubMed ID: 18614160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.