These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism. Dubey A; Keller F; Sturt P Cognition; 2008 Dec; 109(3):326-44. PubMed ID: 19010463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Connectionist semantic systematicity. Frank SL; Haselager WF; van Rooij I Cognition; 2009 Mar; 110(3):358-79. PubMed ID: 19135653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The bit in the middle and why it's important: a computational analysis of the linguistic features of body paragraphs. Myers JC; McCarthy PM; Duran ND; McNamara DS Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):201-9. PubMed ID: 21287126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Metaphor interpretation using paraphrases extracted from the web. Bollegala D; Shutova E PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74304. PubMed ID: 24073207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Semantic similarity between sentences. Honeck RP J Psycholinguist Res; 1973 Jun; 2(2):137-51. PubMed ID: 24197821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference. Simmons S; Estes Z Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):781-95. PubMed ID: 18721916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The QWERTY effect: how typing shapes the meanings of words. Jasmin K; Casasanto D Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):499-504. PubMed ID: 22391999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Relations between mental verb and false belief understanding in Cantonese-speaking children. Cheung H; Chen HC; Yeung W J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Oct; 104(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 19524253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Part two: is it still possible to interpret texts? Skinner Q Int J Psychoanal; 2008 Jun; 89(3):647-54. PubMed ID: 18558961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Exploring dangerous neighborhoods: latent semantic analysis and computing beyond the bounds of the familiar. Cohen T; Blatter B; Patel V AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():151-5. PubMed ID: 16779020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Difference in gamma-band phase synchronization during semantic processing of visually presented words from primary and secondary languages. Kim KH; Choi JW; Yoon J Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 1291():82-91. PubMed ID: 19631628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hungarian layer: A novel interpretable neural layer for paraphrase identification. Xiao H Neural Netw; 2020 Nov; 131():172-184. PubMed ID: 32801109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Semantic dimensions of positive and negative affect concepts]. Marx W Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1985; 137(2):65-73. PubMed ID: 4038038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Archetype-based knowledge management for semantic interoperability of electronic health records. Garde S; Chen R; Leslie H; Beale T; McNicoll I; Heard S Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():1007-11. PubMed ID: 19745465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning. Visser I; Raijmakers ME; Pothos EM Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 19827700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Action semantic knowledge about objects is supported by functional motor activation. van Elk M; van Schie HT; Bekkering H J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1118-28. PubMed ID: 19653753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]