These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19587382)

  • 21. Assessment of criminal recidivism risk with adolescents who have offended sexually: a review.
    Worling JR; Långström N
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2003 Oct; 4(4):341-62. PubMed ID: 15006301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually.
    Spice A; Viljoen JL; Latzman NE; Scalora MJ; Ullman D
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Aug; 25(4):347-69. PubMed ID: 23033066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing reoffense risk with juvenile sexual offenders.
    Kahn TJ; Chambers HJ
    Child Welfare; 1991; 70(3):333-45. PubMed ID: 2070660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy of sexually violent person assessments of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses.
    Caldwell MF
    Sex Abuse; 2013 Oct; 25(5):516-26. PubMed ID: 23508828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Examining the sexual offenses of female juveniles: The relevance of childhood maltreatment.
    Roe-Sepowitz D; Krysik J
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2008 Oct; 78(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 19123761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Juvenile female and male sex offenders: a comparison of offender, victim, and judicial processing characteristics.
    Vandiver DM; Teske R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2006 Apr; 50(2):148-65. PubMed ID: 16510886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexual preferences and recidivism of sex offenders with mental retardation.
    Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C; Chaplin TC
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):409-25. PubMed ID: 19020337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinician's perceptions of indicators of amenability to sex offender-specific treatment in juveniles.
    Kimonis ER; Fanniff A; Borum R; Elliott K
    Sex Abuse; 2011 Jun; 23(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 20966163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of objective measures of sexual arousal and interest: visual reaction time and penile plethysmography.
    Letourneau EJ
    Sex Abuse; 2002 Jul; 14(3):207-23. PubMed ID: 12087683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross-Validation of the JSORRAT-II in Iowa.
    Ralston CA; Epperson DL; Edwards SR
    Sex Abuse; 2016 Sep; 28(6):534-54. PubMed ID: 25179400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of arousal and preference assessment outcomes for sex offenders with intellectual disabilities.
    Reyes JR; Vollmer TR; Hall A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jan; 50(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 27766656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A multisite comparison of actuarial risk instruments for sex offenders.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Quinsey VL; Lalumière ML; Boer D; Lang C
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Sep; 15(3):413-25. PubMed ID: 14593842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Concurrent and predictive validity of the psychopathy checklist: youth version across gender and ethnicity.
    Schmidt F; McKinnon L; Chattha HK; Brownlee K
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Dec; 18(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 17154760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Characterization and prediction of sexual and nonsexual recidivism among adjudicated juvenile sex offenders.
    Christiansen AK; Vincent JP
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(4):506-29. PubMed ID: 23703937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The adolescent sexual offender.
    Pratt HD; Greydanus DE; Patel DR
    Prim Care; 2007 Jun; 34(2):305-16; abstract vii. PubMed ID: 17666229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Examining childhood abuse patterns and sensitive periods in juvenile sexual offenders.
    Grabell AS; Knight RA
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Jun; 21(2):208-22. PubMed ID: 19351968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prospective validity of the Estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR).
    Worling JR; Bookalam D; Litteljohn A
    Sex Abuse; 2012 Jun; 24(3):203-23. PubMed ID: 21969313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A descriptive profile of high-risk sex offenders under intensive supervision in the province of British Columbia, Canada.
    Lussier P; Deslauriers-Varin N; Râtel T
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Feb; 54(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 18923153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.