These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19587401)

  • 1. Science-policy interfacing in support of the Water Framework Directive implementation.
    Vaes G; Willems P; Swartenbroekx P; Kramer K; de Lange W; Kober K
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 19587401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coordinating links among research, standardisation and policy in support of water framework directive chemical monitoring requirements.
    Quevauviller P; Borchers U; Gawlik BM
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):915-23. PubMed ID: 17726551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The inadequacy of monitoring without modelling support.
    Jørgensen LF; Refsgaard JC; Højberg AL
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):931-42. PubMed ID: 17726553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sediment monitoring and the European Water Framework Directive.
    Brils J
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 18946159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Report on EU guidance on groundwater monitoring developed under the common implementation strategy of the water framework directive.
    Grath J; Ward R; Scheidleder A; Quevauviller P
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1162-75. PubMed ID: 17968442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Water Analyser Computer Supported System (AWACSS) Part II: Intelligent, remote-controlled, cost-effective, on-line, water-monitoring measurement system.
    Tschmelak J; Proll G; Riedt J; Kaiser J; Kraemmer P; Bárzaga L; Wilkinson JS; Hua P; Hole JP; Nudd R; Jackson M; Abuknesha R; Barceló D; Rodriguez-Mozaz S; de Alda MJ; Sacher F; Stien J; Slobodník J; Oswald P; Kozmenko H; Korenková E; Tóthová L; Krascsenits Z; Gauglitz G
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 Feb; 20(8):1509-19. PubMed ID: 15626604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Participatory dam systems modelling: a case study of the transboundary Guadiana River in the Iberian Peninsula.
    Máñez M; Froebrich J; Ferrand N; Silva A
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 17851215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive coastal planning and the European Union's water framework directive: a Swedish perspective.
    Gipperth L; Elmgren R
    Ambio; 2005 Mar; 34(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 15865314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Groundwater monitoring in the context of EU legislation: reality and integration needs.
    Quevauviller P
    J Environ Monit; 2005 Feb; 7(2):89-102. PubMed ID: 15690089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Converting science to policy through stakeholder involvement: an analysis of the European Marine Strategy Directive.
    Fletcher S
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2007 Dec; 54(12):1881-6. PubMed ID: 17904165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sources of uncertainty in economic analysis of the Water Framework Directive.
    Mysiak J; Sigel K
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(6):161-6. PubMed ID: 16304948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision of the EU Bathing Water Directive: economic costs and benefits.
    Georgiou S; Bateman IJ
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2005 Apr; 50(4):430-8. PubMed ID: 15823305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Needs of ecotoxicological methods in Italian and European Union legislations in the field of water policy.
    Fabiani C; Casazza G
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2002; 38(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12387138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking water science to policy: results from a series of national workshops on water.
    Schaefer KA; Bielak AT
    Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Feb; 113(1-3):431-42. PubMed ID: 16518673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design of a new monitoring network and first testing of new biological assessment methods according to water framework directive.
    Sommerhäuser M; Scharner C; Schimmer H; Schindler A; Plantikow K; Vietoris F
    J Environ Monit; 2007 Sep; 9(9):966-9. PubMed ID: 17726557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facing the water framework directive challenges: a baseline of stakeholder participation in the European Union.
    De Stefano L
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1332-40. PubMed ID: 20223583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The economic value of water use: implications for implementing the Water Framework Directive in Scotland.
    Moran D; Dann S
    J Environ Manage; 2008 May; 87(3):484-96. PubMed ID: 17561329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of Water Framework Directive objectives in the UK.
    Wilby RL; Orr HG; Hedger M; Forrow D; Blackmore M
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):1043-55. PubMed ID: 16857260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining active farmer involvement with detailed farm data in Denmark: a promising method for achieving water framework directive targets?
    Wright SA; Jacobsen BH
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(10):2625-33. PubMed ID: 20453337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of research advances in modelling and monitoring in support of WFD river basin management planning in the context of climate change.
    Quevauviller P; Barceló D; Beniston M; Djordjevic S; Harding RJ; Iglesias A; Ludwig R; Navarra A; Navarro Ortega A; Mark O; Roson R; Sempere D; Stoffel M; van Lanen HA; Werner M
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Dec; 440():167-77. PubMed ID: 22963987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.