426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19587865)
1. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants.
Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately loaded implants supporting maxillary overdentures.
Akça K; Akkocaoğlu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 16307579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
Kökat AM; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Akkocaoğlu M; Akça K; Cehreli MC
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19359867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around natural teeth vs. immediate oral implants.
Cehreli MC; Akkocaoglu M; Comert A; Tekdemir I; Akca K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):540-8. PubMed ID: 16164459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of abutment angulation on micromotion level for immediately loaded dental implants: a 3-D finite element analysis.
Kao HC; Gung YW; Chung TF; Hsu ML
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 18807557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate versus conventional loading of implant-supported maxillary overdentures: a finite element stress analysis.
Akca K; Eser A; Eckert S; Cavusoglu Y; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):e57-63. PubMed ID: 23527369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.
Koca OL; Eskitascioglu G; Usumez A
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 15623996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanics studies in dentistry: bioengineering applied in oral implantology.
Assunção WG; Barão VA; Tabata LF; Gomes EA; Delben JA; dos Santos PH
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1173-7. PubMed ID: 19568186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strain analysis of maxillary complete denture with three-dimensional finite element method.
Cheng YY; Cheung WL; Chow TW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):309-18. PubMed ID: 20416415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Delben JA; Gomes EA; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1066-71. PubMed ID: 19553853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
