These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19587871)

  • 1. Performance of ultrasonic devices for bone surgery and associated intraosseous temperature development.
    Harder S; Wolfart S; Mehl C; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 19587871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for reducing cutting temperature in ultrasonic cutting of bone.
    Cardoni A; MacBeath A; Lucas M
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e37-42. PubMed ID: 16876220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cutting characteristics of ultrasonic surgical instruments.
    Parmar D; Mann M; Walmsley AD; Lea SC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1385-90. PubMed ID: 21382091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased intraosseous temperature caused by ultrasonic devices during bone surgery and the influences of working pressure and cooling irrigation.
    Birkenfeld F; Becker ME; Harder S; Lucius R; Kern M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1382-8. PubMed ID: 23189287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intraosseous heat generation during sonic, ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy.
    Rashad A; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Heiland M; Smeets R; Hanken H; Gröbe A; Assaf AT; Köhnke RH; Mehryar P; Riecke B; Wikner J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 43(7):1072-7. PubMed ID: 26116310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro comparison of the cutting efficiency and temperature production of ten different rotary cutting instruments. Part II: electric handpiece and comparison with turbine.
    Ercoli C; Rotella M; Funkenbusch PD; Russell S; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):319-31. PubMed ID: 19410066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Heat production during different ultrasonic and conventional osteotomy preparations for dental implants.
    Rashad A; Kaiser A; Prochnow N; Schmitz I; Hoffmann E; Maurer P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1361-5. PubMed ID: 21435005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micromorphometrical analyses of five different ultrasonic osteotomy devices at the rabbit skull.
    Hollstein S; Hoffmann E; Vogel J; Heyroth F; Prochnow N; Maurer P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jun; 23(6):713-718. PubMed ID: 21488969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Piezosurgery in the cochleostomy through multiple middle ear approaches.
    Salami A; Dellepiane M; Mora F; Crippa B; Mora R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 May; 72(5):653-7. PubMed ID: 18328573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization.
    Chacon GE; Bower DL; Larsen PE; McGlumphy EA; Beck FM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 16413899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimental and histological investigations of the bone using two different oscillating osteotomy techniques compared with conventional rotary osteotomy.
    Heinemann F; Hasan I; Kunert-Keil C; Götz W; Gedrange T; Spassov A; Schweppe J; Gredes T
    Ann Anat; 2012 Mar; 194(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 22056295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Micromorphometric analysis of bone blocks harvested with eight different ultrasonic and sonic devices for osseous surgery.
    Stacchi C; Berton F; Turco G; Franco M; Navarra CO; Andolsek F; Maglione M; Di Lenarda R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1143-51. PubMed ID: 27527676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of drill wear on cutting efficiency and heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: a study of drill durability.
    Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Lee HJ; Moss ME; Graser GN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(3):335-49. PubMed ID: 15214217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Durability of oscillating bone saw blades.
    Ark TW; Thacker JG; McGregor W; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1997; 7(3-4):271-8. PubMed ID: 10176137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Light microscopic examination of rabbit skulls following conventional and Piezosurgery osteotomy].
    Maurer P; Kriwalsky MS; Block Veras R; Brandt J; Heiss C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Oct; 52(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 17915997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphological characteristics of osteotomies using different piezosurgical devices. A scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Bauer SE; Romanos GE
    Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 24819806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A technique for quantifying the performance of oscillating bone saw blades.
    Ark TW; Thacker JG; McGregor W; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1997; 7(3-4):255-70. PubMed ID: 10176136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new method for osteotomies in oncologic nasal surgery: Piezosurgery.
    Salami A; Dellepiane M; Crippa B; Mora R
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2010; 31(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 20015732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterisation of bone following ultrasonic cutting.
    Claire S; Lea SC; Walmsley AD
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Apr; 17(3):905-12. PubMed ID: 22638772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Osteotomy speed, heat development, and bone structure influence by various piezoelectric systems-an in vitro study.
    Noetzel N; Fienitz T; Kreppel M; Zirk M; Safi AF; Rothamel D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Nov; 23(11):4029-4041. PubMed ID: 30826919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.