These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19588288)

  • 1. A cost-benefit analysis of endoscopy reporting methods: handwritten, dictated and computerized.
    Groenen MJ; Ajodhia S; Wynstra JY; Lesterhuis W; van de Weijgert EJ; Kuipers EJ; Ouwendijk RJ
    Endoscopy; 2009 Jul; 41(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 19588288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized endoscopic reporting is no more time-consuming than reporting with conventional methods.
    Soekhoe JK; Groenen MJ; van Ginneken AM; Khaliq G; Lesterhuis W; van Tilburg AJ; Ouwendijk RJ
    Eur J Intern Med; 2007 Jul; 18(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 17574108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pilot study to document the return on investment for implementing an ambulatory electronic health record at an academic medical center.
    Grieger DL; Cohen SH; Krusch DA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jul; 205(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 17617337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerisation of endoscopy reports using standard reports and text blocks.
    Groenen MJ; Kuipers EJ; van Berge Henegouwen GP; Fockens P; Ouwendijk RJ
    Neth J Med; 2006 Mar; 64(3):78-83. PubMed ID: 16547359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic prescribing: a review of costs and benefits.
    Corley ST
    Top Health Inf Manage; 2003; 24(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 12674393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.
    Hogan RB; Santa-Cruz R; Weeks ES; Alexander L; Hogan RB
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Feb; 69(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 18725156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Financial analysis projects clear returns from electronic medical records.
    Schmitt KF; Wofford DA
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Jan; 56(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 11806319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project.
    Delvaux M; Crespi M; Armengol-Miro JR; Hagenmüller F; Teuffel W; Spencer KB; Stettin J; Zwiebel FM
    Endoscopy; 2000 Apr; 32(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 10774976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finding the ROI in EMRs.
    Thompson DI; Fleming NS
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Jul; 62(7):76-81. PubMed ID: 18683417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Costs of digestive endoscopy in a level II university hospital].
    Pascual Torres D; Brú Budesca X
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2003 May; 26(5):279-87. PubMed ID: 12732099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Productivity and cost implications of implementing electronic medical records into an ambulatory surgical subspecialty clinic.
    Patil M; Puri L; Gonzalez CM
    Urology; 2008 Feb; 71(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 18308076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition systems. Are they up to the task?
    Health Devices; 2002 Feb; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 11898680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dictated and transcribed medical record can be cost effective.
    Stueven HA; Tonsfeldt DJ; Hargarten KM; Olson DW
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1991 Jun; 62(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 10113622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Electronic documentation of findings, performance statistics and image analysis in endoscopy].
    Swobodnik W; Kuhn K
    Z Gastroenterol; 1992 Mar; 30(3):202-3. PubMed ID: 1590018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The economic effect of implementing an EMR in an outpatient clinical setting.
    Barlow S; Johnson J; Steck J
    J Healthc Inf Manag; 2004; 18(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 14971079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is endoscopic screening before major surgical procedures warranted?
    Sonnenberg A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Sep; 64(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 16923485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Materials management system in interventional radiology -- initial experience with a computer-supported program].
    Clevert DA; Jung EM; Reiser M; Rupp N
    Rofo; 2004 Oct; 176(10):1475-80. PubMed ID: 15383981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The financial impact of underestimating personnel needs associated with implementing a computerized patient record in the intensive care unit.
    Randolph AG; Ogawa S
    J Crit Care; 2007 Mar; 22(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 17371743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cost-benefit analysis of a semi-automated process in the preparation of unit-doses by the Pharmacy Department].
    Poveda Andrés JL; Hernández Sansalvador M; Díez Martínez AM; García Gómez C
    Farm Hosp; 2004; 28(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 15101798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A methodological and operative framework for the evaluation of an e-health project.
    Buccoliero L; Calciolari S; Marsilio M
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2008; 23(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 17624883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.