1717 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19590115)
1. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detective quantum efficiency measured as a function of energy for two full-field digital mammography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(9):2845-61. PubMed ID: 19384004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. NPWE model observer as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis of digital detectors in general radiography.
Van Peteghem N; Bosmans H; Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N575-N591. PubMed ID: 27754987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of the effects of the FineView algorithm for full field digital mammography.
Urbanczyk H; McDonagh E; Marshall NW; Castellano I
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1987-2003. PubMed ID: 22429938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.
Monnin P; Marshall NW; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4221-38. PubMed ID: 21701050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5655-73. PubMed ID: 17047276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DQE analysis on a dual detector phase x-ray imaging system.
Zhang D; Liu H; Wu X
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(18):5165-76. PubMed ID: 18723931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A search for optimal x-ray spectra in iodine contrast media mammography.
Ullman G; Sandborg M; Dance DR; Yaffe M; Alm Carlsson G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3143-52. PubMed ID: 15972986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and application of programs to measure modulation transfer function, noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency.
Padgett R; Kotre CJ
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):283-7. PubMed ID: 16461517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
Kepler K; Vladimirov A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
