160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19591118)
1. When are summary ROC curves appropriate for diagnostic meta-analyses?
Chappell FM; Raab GM; Wardlaw JM
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(21):2653-68. PubMed ID: 19591118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Schlattmann P
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Apr; 61(5):777-794. PubMed ID: 36656998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
Patel A; Cooper N; Freeman S; Sutton A
Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 32706182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
Plana MN; Arevalo-Rodriguez I; Fernández-García S; Soto J; Fabregate M; Pérez T; Roqué M; Zamora J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):306. PubMed ID: 36443653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques in the evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Jones CM; Athanasiou T
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jan; 79(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 15620907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data.
Takwoingi Y; Guo B; Riley RD; Deeks JJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1896-1911. PubMed ID: 26116616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
Macaskill P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
Hattori S; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures.
Doebler P; Holling H
Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1084-104. PubMed ID: 25361619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Matsushima Y; Noma H; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 31724796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Moses-Littenberg meta-analytical method generates systematic differences in test accuracy compared to hierarchical meta-analytical models.
Dinnes J; Mallett S; Hopewell S; Roderick PJ; Deeks JJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 80():77-87. PubMed ID: 27485293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.
Doebler P; Holling H; Böhning D
Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):418-36. PubMed ID: 22582866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Leeflang MM; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Bossuyt PM;
Ann Intern Med; 2008 Dec; 149(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 19075208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
