These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19591118)

  • 21. Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA.
    Freeman SC; Kerby CR; Patel A; Cooper NJ; Quinn T; Sutton AJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):81. PubMed ID: 30999861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Harbord RM; Deeks JJ; Egger M; Whiting P; Sterne JA
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 16698768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fully non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for random-effects meta-analysis.
    Martínez-Camblor P
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 24872352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Kester AD; Buntinx F
    Med Decis Making; 2000; 20(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 11059476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.
    Ma X; Nie L; Cole SR; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1596-619. PubMed ID: 23804970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis.
    Simmonds MC; Higgins JP
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2858-2877. PubMed ID: 24823642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):301-313. PubMed ID: 31953903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Application of summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) analysis to diagnostic clinical testing.
    Rosman AS; Korsten MA
    Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():76-82. PubMed ID: 18217394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A meta-analytic method for summarizing diagnostic test performances: receiver-operating-characteristic-summary point estimates.
    Midgette AS; Stukel TA; Littenberg B
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):253-7. PubMed ID: 8412556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis of clinical studies of diagnostic tests: developments in how the receiver operating characteristic "works".
    Hurley J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Dec; 135(12):1585-90. PubMed ID: 22129189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. IPDmada: An R Shiny tool for analyzing and visualizing individual patient data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Wang J; Keusters WR; Wen L; Leeflang MMG
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 32808437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
    Hwang YT; Wang CC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta-binomial distributions and bivariate copulas.
    Kuss O; Hoyer A; Solms A
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 23873593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modelling multiple thresholds in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Steinhauser S; Schumacher M; Rücker G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 27520527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Univariate and bivariate likelihood-based meta-analysis methods performed comparably when marginal sensitivity and specificity were the targets of inference.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Schmid CH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Mar; 83():8-17. PubMed ID: 28063915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A multivariate method for meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests.
    Dimou NL; Adam M; Bagos PG
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3509-23. PubMed ID: 26940666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves: Additional flexibility by using semiparametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):528-538. PubMed ID: 31231986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.