242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19591449)
1. Acoustic differential extraction for forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Norris JV; Evander M; Horsman-Hall KM; Nilsson J; Laurell T; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2009 Aug; 81(15):6089-95. PubMed ID: 19591449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Separation of sperm and epithelial cells in a microfabricated device: potential application to forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Horsman KM; Barker SL; Ferrance JP; Forrest KA; Koen KA; Landers JP
Anal Chem; 2005 Feb; 77(3):742-9. PubMed ID: 15679339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic trapping of sperm cells from mock sexual assault samples.
Clark CP; Xu K; Scott O; Hickey J; Tsuei AC; Jackson K; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():42-49. PubMed ID: 30954892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Validation of Differential Extraction Kit in forensic sexual assault cases].
Wu D; Cao Y; Xu Y; He BF; Bi G; Zhou HG
Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 25(6):440-2. PubMed ID: 20225622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automation of the standard DNA differential extraction on the Hamilton AutoLys STAR system: A proof-of-concept study.
Timken MD; Klein SB; Kubala S; Scharnhorst G; Buoncristiani MR; Miller KWP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():96-104. PubMed ID: 30785062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Filtration based DNA preparation for sexual assault cases.
Garvin AM
J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):1084-7. PubMed ID: 14535671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced recovery of spermatozoa and comprehensive lysis of epithelial cells from sexual assault samples having a low cell counts or aged up to one year.
Lounsbury JA; Nambiar SM; Karlsson A; Cunniffe H; Norris JV; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Jan; 8(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 24315594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microchip-based cell lysis and DNA extraction from sperm cells for application to forensic analysis.
Bienvenue JM; Duncalf N; Marchiarullo D; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Mar; 51(2):266-73. PubMed ID: 16566759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A physical method for separating spermatozoa from epithelial cells in sexual assault evidence.
Chen J; Kobilinsky L; Wolosin D; Shaler R; Baum H
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 9456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. HLA DQA1 and Polymarker validations for forensic casework: standard specimens, reproducibility, and mixed specimens.
Gross AM; Guerrieri RA
J Forensic Sci; 1996 Nov; 41(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 8914290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraction of DNA from forensic-type sexual assault specimens using simple, rapid sonication procedures.
Crouse CA; Ban JD; D'Alessio JK
Biotechniques; 1993 Oct; 15(4):641-4, 646, 648. PubMed ID: 7902722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA testing of sexual assault evidence: the laboratory perspective.
Burg A; Kahn R; Welch K
J Forensic Nurs; 2011 Sep; 7(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 21884402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automation of the Differential Digestion Process of Sexual Assault Evidence.
Wong H; Mihalovich J
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):539-550. PubMed ID: 30044890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Forensic DNA analysis on microfluidic devices: a review.
Horsman KM; Bienvenue JM; Blasier KR; Landers JP
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):784-99. PubMed ID: 17553097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inferring the presence of spermatozoa in forensic samples based on male DNA fractionation following differential extraction.
Alderson G; Gurevitch H; Casimiro T; Reid B; Millman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():225-232. PubMed ID: 30077873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Capillary zone electrophoresis separation and collection of spermatozoa for the forensic analysis of sexual assault evidence.
Wright SN; Huge BJ; Dovichi NJ
Electrophoresis; 2020 Aug; 41(15):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 32453860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a rapid, 96-well alkaline based differential DNA extraction method for sexual assault evidence.
Hudlow WR; Buoncristiani MR
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Jan; 6(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21288791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A portable sperm cell purification instrument based on continuous flow acoustophoretic separation of sperm cells for on-site forensic sample pretreatment.
Sun K; Wang H; Wang L; Lu Y; Liu R; Liu P; Cheng J
Lab Chip; 2021 Mar; 21(5):933-941. PubMed ID: 33439185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The problem of untested sexual assault kits: why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory?
Patterson D; Campbell R
J Interpers Violence; 2012 Jul; 27(11):2259-75. PubMed ID: 22258072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The forensic aspects of sexual violence.
Newton M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 23062592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
