These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19591449)

  • 21. Direct analysis in real time mass spectrometry for analysis of sexual assault evidence.
    Musah RA; Cody RB; Dane AJ; Vuong AL; Shepard JR
    Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom; 2012 May; 26(9):1039-46. PubMed ID: 22467453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developmental validation of an efficient differential separation method incorporating the i-sep
    White TJ; Rye MS; Tay JW
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 35373351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An integrated microfluidic device for DNA purification and PCR amplification of STR fragments.
    Bienvenue JM; Legendre LA; Ferrance JP; Landers JP
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Apr; 4(3):178-86. PubMed ID: 20215029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between MACSprep™ forensic sperm microbead kit and Erase Sperm Isolation kit for the enrichment of sperm fractions recovered from sexual assault samples.
    Grosjean F; Favre M; Castella V
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jan; 137(1):267-278. PubMed ID: 35773355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [The primary investigation of material evidence and the evaluation of its suitability for expert biological identification by genomic "dactyloscopy"].
    Boldesku NG; Gyské LI; Gurtovaia SV; Ivanov PL
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1990; 33(4):11-4. PubMed ID: 2087742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laser microdissection separation of pure spermatozoa from epithelial cells for short tandem repeat analysis.
    Sanders CT; Sanchez N; Ballantyne J; Peterson DA
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jul; 51(4):748-57. PubMed ID: 16882215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Forensic evidence collection and DNA identification in acute child sexual assault.
    Thackeray JD; Hornor G; Benzinger EA; Scribano PV
    Pediatrics; 2011 Aug; 128(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 21788217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analytical approaches to differential extraction for sexual assault evidence.
    Clark C; Turiello R; Cotton R; Landers JP
    Anal Chim Acta; 2021 Jan; 1141():230-245. PubMed ID: 33248657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Post-coital vaginal sampling with nylon flocked swabs improves DNA typing.
    Benschop CC; Wiebosch DC; Kloosterman AD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2010 Feb; 4(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 20129470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sperm cell purification from mock forensic swabs using SOMAmer™ affinity reagents.
    Katilius E; Carmel AB; Koss H; O'Connell D; Smith BC; Sanders GM; LaBerge GS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():9-13. PubMed ID: 29609058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Personal identification using DNA polymorphism--the identification of forensic biological materials].
    Shiono H
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Oct; 50(5):320-30. PubMed ID: 8952331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applicability of the ParaDNA(®) Screening System to Seminal Samples.
    Tribble ND; Miller JA; Dawnay N; Duxbury NJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):690-2. PubMed ID: 25739746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of the BioMek 2000 Laboratory Automation Workstation and the DNA IQ System to the extraction of forensic casework samples.
    Greenspoon SA; Ban JD; Sykes K; Ballard EJ; Edler SS; Baisden M; Covington BL
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 14979341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence.
    Klein SB; Buoncristiani MR
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():109-117. PubMed ID: 28419902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A methodology based on NMR spectroscopy for the forensic analysis of condoms.
    Lee GS; Brinch KM; Kannangara K; Dawson M; Wilson MA
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jul; 46(4):808-21. PubMed ID: 11451061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A confirmatory test for sperm in sexual assault samples using a microfluidic-integrated cell phone imaging system.
    Deshmukh S; Inci F; Karaaslan MG; Ogut MG; Duncan D; Klevan L; Duncan G; Demirci U
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102313. PubMed ID: 32570000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Alternative direct-to-amplification sperm cell lysis techniques for sexual assault sample processing.
    Schellhammer SK; Hudson BC; Cox JO; Dawson Green T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(4):1668-1678. PubMed ID: 35285573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Securing evidence after sexual offences is an important task for physicians. Increasing severity of crimes and use of DNA analyses necessitate higher quality standards].
    Ansell R
    Lakartidningen; 1998 Oct; 95(42):4626-8, 4630-1. PubMed ID: 9814019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. QIAamp spin columns as a method of DNA isolation for forensic casework.
    Greenspoon SA; Scarpetta MA; Drayton ML; Turek SA
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1024-30. PubMed ID: 9729819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A proof of principal study on the use of direct PCR of semen and spermatozoa and development of a differential isolation protocol for use in cases of alleged sexual assault.
    Tobe SS; Swaran YC; Dennany L; Sibbing U; Schulze Johann K; Welch L; Vennemann M
    Int J Legal Med; 2017 Jan; 131(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 27832353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.