147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1959200)
1. Does myocardial stunning contribute to infarct size limitation by ischemic preconditioning?
Miura T; Goto M; Urabe K; Endoh A; Shimamoto K; Iimura O
Circulation; 1991 Dec; 84(6):2504-12. PubMed ID: 1959200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of regional contractile function by preconditioning ischemia does not play a permissive role in the infarct size-limitation by the preconditioning.
Goto M; Miura T; Itoya M; Sakamoto J; Iimura O
Basic Res Cardiol; 1993; 88(6):594-606. PubMed ID: 8147824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size in swine myocardium.
Schott RJ; Rohmann S; Braun ER; Schaper W
Circ Res; 1990 Apr; 66(4):1133-42. PubMed ID: 2317890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nitric oxide donors induce late preconditioning against myocardial stunning and infarction in conscious rabbits via an antioxidant-sensitive mechanism.
Takano H; Tang XL; Qiu Y; Guo Y; French BA; Bolli R
Circ Res; 1998 Jul; 83(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 9670920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The early and late phases of ischemic preconditioning: a comparative analysis of their effects on infarct size, myocardial stunning, and arrhythmias in conscious pigs undergoing a 40-minute coronary occlusion.
Qiu Y; Tang XL; Park SW; Sun JZ; Kalya A; Bolli R
Circ Res; 1997 May; 80(5):730-42. PubMed ID: 9130454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coronary cyclic flow variations "precondition" ischemic myocardium.
Ovize M; Kloner RA; Hale SL; Przyklenk K
Circulation; 1992 Feb; 85(2):779-89. PubMed ID: 1735170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning was not attenuated by oxygen free-radical scavengers in the rabbit.
Iwamoto T; Miura T; Adachi T; Noto T; Ogawa T; Tsuchida A; Iimura O
Circulation; 1991 Mar; 83(3):1015-22. PubMed ID: 1999006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preconditioning does not attenuate myocardial stunning.
Ovize M; Przyklenk K; Hale SL; Kloner RA
Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2247-54. PubMed ID: 1591839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Myocardial protection is lost before contractile function recovers from ischemic preconditioning.
Murry CE; Richard VJ; Jennings RB; Reimer KA
Am J Physiol; 1991 Mar; 260(3 Pt 2):H796-804. PubMed ID: 2000974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Myocardial infarct size-Limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning: Its natural decay and the effect of repetitive preconditioning.
Miura T; Adachi T; Ogawa T; Iwamoto T; Tsuchida A; Iimur O
Cardiovasc Pathol; 1992; 1(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 25990126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Infarct size-limiting effect of ischemic preconditioning is blunted by inhibition of 5'-nucleotidase activity and attenuation of adenosine release.
Kitakaze M; Hori M; Morioka T; Minamino T; Takashima S; Sato H; Shinozaki Y; Chujo M; Mori H; Inoue M
Circulation; 1994 Mar; 89(3):1237-46. PubMed ID: 8124812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion.
Przyklenk K; Bauer B; Ovize M; Kloner RA; Whittaker P
Circulation; 1993 Mar; 87(3):893-9. PubMed ID: 7680290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does preconditioning protect the coronary vasculature from subsequent ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Bauer B; Simkhovich BZ; Kloner RA; Przyklenk K
Circulation; 1993 Aug; 88(2):659-72. PubMed ID: 8339428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ischaemic preconditioning in a model of global ischaemia: infarct size limitation, but no reduction of stunning.
Jenkins DP; Pugsley WB; Yellon DM
J Mol Cell Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 27(8):1623-32. PubMed ID: 8523425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac protection by ischaemic preconditioning is not mediated by myocardial stunning.
Matsuda M; Catena TG; Vander Heide RS; Jennings RB; Reimer KA
Cardiovasc Res; 1993 Apr; 27(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 8324790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ischemic preconditioning fails to limit infarct size in reserpinized rabbit myocardium. Implication of norepinephrine release in the preconditioning effect.
Toombs CF; Wiltse AL; Shebuski RJ
Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):2351-8. PubMed ID: 8222128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infarct size limitation by a new Na(+)-H+ exchange inhibitor, Hoe 642: difference from preconditioning in the role of protein kinase C.
Miura T; Ogawa T; Suzuki K; Goto M; Shimamoto K
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 29(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 9060913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preconditioning improves energy metabolism during reperfusion but does not attenuate myocardial stunning in porcine hearts.
Miyamae M; Fujiwara H; Kida M; Yokota R; Tanaka M; Katsuragawa M; Hasegawa K; Ohura M; Koga K; Yabuuchi Y
Circulation; 1993 Jul; 88(1):223-34. PubMed ID: 8319337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Loss of myocardial protection after preconditioning correlates with the time course of glycogen recovery within the preconditioned segment.
Wolfe CL; Sievers RE; Visseren FL; Donnelly TJ
Circulation; 1993 Mar; 87(3):881-92. PubMed ID: 8443909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preconditioning causes improved wall motion as well as smaller infarcts after transient coronary occlusion in rabbits.
Cohen MV; Liu GS; Downey JM
Circulation; 1991 Jul; 84(1):341-9. PubMed ID: 2060104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
