191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19592181)
1. PCR-AGE, automated and manual methods to identify Candida strains from veterinary sources: a comparative approach.
Brito EH; Brilhante RS; Cordeiro RA; Sidrim JJ; Fontenelle RO; Melo LM; Albuquerque ES; Rocha MF
Vet Microbiol; 2009 Nov; 139(3-4):318-22. PubMed ID: 19592181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiplex PCR using internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2 regions for rapid detection and identification of yeast strains.
Fujita SI; Senda Y; Nakaguchi S; Hashimoto T
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Oct; 39(10):3617-22. PubMed ID: 11574582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Real-time LightCycler polymerase chain reaction and melting temperature analysis for identification of clinically important Candida spp.
Khan Z; Mustafa AS; Alam FF
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2009 Aug; 42(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 19949751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of Candida species using PCR-RFLP in cancer patients in Iran.
Shokohi T; Hashemi Soteh MB; Saltanat Pouri Z; Hedayati MT; Mayahi S
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2010; 28(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 20404462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A rapid PCR-based method for identification of four important Candida species.
Nazzal D; Yasin S; Abu-Elteen K
New Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 28(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 16240697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of methods for the identification of the most common yeasts in the clinical microbiology laboratory].
Guelfand L; Grisolía P; Bozzano C; Kaufman S
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12833681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of the significance of molecular methods in the diagnosis of invasive fungal infections: comparison with conventional methods].
Susever S; Yeğenoğlu Y
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2011 Apr; 45(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 21644076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular diagnosis and epidemiology of fungal infections.
Reiss E; Tanaka K; Bruker G; Chazalet V; Coleman D; Debeaupuis JP; Hanazawa R; Latgé JP; Lortholary J; Makimura K; Morrison CJ; Murayama SY; Naoe S; Paris S; Sarfati J; Shibuya K; Sullivan D; Uchida K; Yamaguchi H
Med Mycol; 1998; 36 Suppl 1():249-57. PubMed ID: 9988514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Species identification and strain differentiation of clinical Candida isolates using the DiversiLab system of automated repetitive sequence-based PCR.
Wise MG; Healy M; Reece K; Smith R; Walton D; Dutch W; Renwick A; Huong J; Young S; Tarrand J; Kontoyiannis DP
J Med Microbiol; 2007 Jun; 56(Pt 6):778-787. PubMed ID: 17510263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of phenotypic methods for the identification of Candida dubliniensis.
Pasligh J; Radecke C; Fleischhacker M; Ruhnke M
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2010 Apr; 43(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 20457432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between multiplex PCR and phenotypic systems for Candida spp. identification.
Liguori G; Gallé F; Lucariello A; Di Onofrio V; Albano L; Mazzarella G; D'Amora M; Rossano F
New Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 33(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 20402415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid simultaneous detection and identification of six species Candida using polymerase chain reaction and reverse line hybridization assay.
Xiang H; Xiong L; Liu X; Tu Z
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 May; 69(2):282-7. PubMed ID: 17337309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of medically important
Bayraktar S; Duran N; Duran GG; Eryilmaz N; Aslan H; Önlen C; Özer B
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2017; 35(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 29405146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PCR-enzyme immunoassay of rDNA in the diagnosis of candidemia and comparison with amplicon detection by agarose gel electrophoresis.
Ahmad S; Mustafa AS; Khan Z; Al-Rifaiy AI; Khan ZU
Int J Med Microbiol; 2004 Jul; 294(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15293453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PCR-based identification of pathogenic Candida species using primer mixes specific to Candida DNA topoisomerase II genes.
Kanbe T; Horii T; Arishima T; Ozeki M; Kikuchi A
Yeast; 2002 Aug; 19(11):973-89. PubMed ID: 12125054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of different methods for the identification of Candida species isolated from clinical specimens].
Cetinkaya Z; Altindiş M; Aktepe OC; Karabiçak N
Mikrobiyol Bul; 2003 Oct; 37(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 14748264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Molecular identification and distribution profile of Candida species isolated from Iranian patients.
Mohammadi R; Mirhendi H; Rezaei-Matehkolaei A; Ghahri M; Shidfar MR; Jalalizand N; Makimura K
Med Mycol; 2013 Aug; 51(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 23470036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identification of Candida dubliniensis in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory.
Momani OM; Qaddoomi A
East Mediterr Health J; 2005 May; 11(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16602455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. rDNA-RFLP identification of Candida species in immunocompromised and seriously diseased patients.
Pinto PM; Resende MA; Koga-Ito CY; Ferreira JA; Tendler M
Can J Microbiol; 2004 Jul; 50(7):514-20. PubMed ID: 15381977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of standard phenotypic assays with a PCR method to discriminate Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis.
Mähnss B; Stehr F; Schäfer W; Neuber K
Mycoses; 2005 Jan; 48(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15679668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
