These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19592600)

  • 1. Monte Carlo determination of the characteristic limits in measurement of ionising radiation--fundamentals and numerics.
    Weise K; Kanisch G; Michel R; Schläger M; Schrammel D; Täschner M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Jul; 135(3):169-96. PubMed ID: 19592600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian decision threshold, detection limit and confidence limits in ionising-radiation measurement.
    Weise K; Hübel K; Rose E; Schläger M; Schrammel D; Täschner M; Michel R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 16868015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uncertainties in personal dosimetry for external radiation: a Monte Carlo approach.
    van Dijk JW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17052989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainties beyond statistics in Monte Carlo simulations.
    Hughes HG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):45-51. PubMed ID: 17766264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of flux distributions with Monte Carlo functional expansion tallies.
    Griesheimer DP; Martin WR; Holloway JP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):428-32. PubMed ID: 16381761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS.
    Theodorou D; Meligotsidou L; Karavoltsos S; Burnetas A; Dassenakis M; Scoullos M
    Talanta; 2011 Feb; 83(5):1568-74. PubMed ID: 21238753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neutron stimulated emission computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation approach.
    Sharma AC; Harrawood BP; Bender JE; Tourassi GD; Kapadia AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(20):6117-31. PubMed ID: 17921575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainties in doses from intakes of radionuclides assessed from monitoring measurements.
    Etherington G; Birchall A; Puncher M; Molokanov A; Blanchardon E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 17135426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to account for uncertainty due to measurement errors in an uncertainty analysis using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Hofer E
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 18695409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo methods and techniques status and prospects for future evolution.
    Vaz P
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):536-41. PubMed ID: 19942445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a Monte Carlo method for uncertainty calculation, with an application to the measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent rate.
    Cox M; Harris P; Nam G; Thomas D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 16877469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulation of a computed tomography x-ray tube.
    Bazalova M; Verhaegen F
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):5945-55. PubMed ID: 17881811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty in radiation dosimetry: basic concepts and methods.
    Siebert BR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 16868011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of doses calculated by the Monte Carlo method and measured by LiF TLD in the buildup region for a 60Co photon beam.
    Budanec M; Knezević Z; Bokulić T; Mrcela I; Vrtar M; Vekić B; Kusić Z
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 18541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of cellular irradiation techniques with alpha particles using the Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit.
    Incerti S; Gault N; Habchi C; Lefaix JL; Moretto P; Poncy JL; Pouthier T; Seznec H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17132663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitfalls and modelling inconsistencies in computational radiation dosimetry: lessons learnt from the QUADOS intercomparison. Part I: Neutrons and uncertainties.
    Siebert BR; Tanner RJ; Chartier JL; Agosteo S; Grosswendt B; Gualdrini G; Ménard S; Kodeli I; Leuthold GP; Price RA; Tagziria H; Terrissol M; Zankl M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 16698968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The examination of source distribution in a large sample by Monte Carlo simulation.
    Gurau D; Sima O
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2141-3. PubMed ID: 22417694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of transmission data of diagnostic X rays through concrete using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Noto K; Koshida K; Iida H; Fukuda A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(3):144-52. PubMed ID: 19307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The denoising of Monte Carlo dose distributions using convolution superposition calculations.
    El Naqa I; Cui J; Lindsay P; Olivera G; Deasy JO
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):N375-85. PubMed ID: 17762073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.