197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19593052)
1. Preserving consent-for-consent with feasibility-assessment and recruitment in clinical studies: FARSITE architecture.
Ainsworth J; Buchan I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 147():137-48. PubMed ID: 19593052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recruitment in pediatric clinical trials: an ethical perspective.
Afshar K; Lodha A; Costei A; Vaneyke N
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):835-40. PubMed ID: 16093965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Timing invitations to participate in clinical research: preliminary versus informed consent.
Iltis AS
J Med Philos; 2005 Feb; 30(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 15814369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.
Bento SF; Hardy E; Osis MJ
Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 19046257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving subject recruitment by maintaining truly informed consent: a practical benefit of disclosing adverse clinical trial results.
Shah KR; Batzer FR
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Aug; 9(8):36-7. PubMed ID: 19998157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Post-recruitment confirmation of informed consent by SMS.
Gulbrandsen P; Jensen BF
J Med Ethics; 2010 Feb; 36(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 20133410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvitation of eligible individuals to participate in pediatric studies: a qualitative study.
Amiel P; Moreau D; Vincent-Genod C; Alberti C; Hankard R; Ravaud P; Gottot S; Gaultier C
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2007 May; 161(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 17485619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consent in resuscitation trials: benefit or harm for patients and society?
Nichol G; Powell J; van Ottingham L; Maier R; Rea T; Christenson J; Hallstrom A
Resuscitation; 2006 Sep; 70(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16908094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voluntary informed consent in research and clinical care: an update.
Cahana A; Hurst SA
Pain Pract; 2008; 8(6):446-51. PubMed ID: 19000172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases.
Dokholyan RS; Muhlbaier LH; Falletta JM; Jacobs JP; Shahian D; Haan CK; Peterson ED
Am Heart J; 2009 Jun; 157(6):971-82. PubMed ID: 19464406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review board consideration of chart reviews, case reports, and observational studies.
Neff MJ
Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1350-3. PubMed ID: 18811999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards.
Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD
J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What a tangled web we weave: ethical and legal implications of deception in recruitment.
Pierce R
Account Res; 2008; 15(4):262-82. PubMed ID: 18972266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design of trials with dying patients: a feasibility study of cluster randomisation versus randomised consent.
Fowell A; Johnstone R; Finlay IG; Russell D; Russell IT
Palliat Med; 2006 Dec; 20(8):799-804. PubMed ID: 17148534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. I don't like that, it's tricking people too much...: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke.
Mangset M; Førde R; Nessa J; Berge E; Wyller TB
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):751-6. PubMed ID: 18827109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Canadian community health survey as a potential recruitment vehicle for the Canadian longitudinal study on aging.
Wolfson C; Raina PS; Kirkland SA; Pelletier A; Uniat J; Furlini L; Angus CL; Strople G; Keshavarz H; Szala-Meneok K
Can J Aging; 2009 Sep; 28(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 19860979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Privacy and confidentiality in pragmatic clinical trials.
McGraw D; Greene SM; Miner CS; Staman KL; Welch MJ; Rubel A
Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):520-9. PubMed ID: 26374682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lung cancer patients' perceptions of informed consent documents.
Sand K; Loge JH; Berger O; Grønberg BH; Kaasa S
Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Nov; 73(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 18691845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient reactions to confidentiality, liability, and financial aspects of informed consent in cardiology research.
Fortune-Greeley AK; Hardy NC; Lin L; Friedman JY; Lawlor JS; Muhlbaier LH; Hall MA; Schulman KA; Sugarman J; Weinfurt KP
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2010 Mar; 3(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 20233979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
