These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19594086)

  • 1. A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.
    Guthrie LA; Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):381-90. PubMed ID: 19594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.
    Sammeth CA; Birman M; Hecox KE
    Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired.
    van Buuren RA; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):211-21. PubMed ID: 7731212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems.
    Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SSW test performance-intensity functions for hearing-impaired adults.
    Flynn PA; Danhauer JL; Gerber SE; Goller MC; Arnst DJ
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):346-8. PubMed ID: 6510580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the NAL(R) and Cambridge formulae for the fitting of linear hearing aids.
    Peters RW; Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Feb; 34(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 10759075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of adaptive procedure estimates of PF-max level.
    Kamm CA; Morgan DE; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 May; 48(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 6621012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient selection for incus body coupling of a totally implantable middle ear implant.
    Zenner HP; Baumann JW; Reischl G; Plinkert P; Zimmermann R; Mauz PS; Limberger A; Maassen MM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Aug; 123(6):683-96. PubMed ID: 12953766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level.
    Dirks DD; Kamm CA; Dubno JR; Velde TM
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 7323674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition, loudness, and preference with extended bandwidth hearing aids for adult hearing aid users.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Folkeard P; Glista D; Scollie S
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):780-791. PubMed ID: 32309996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a Protocol for Integrated Speech Audiometry.
    Punch J; Rakerd B
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 30535271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Instantaneous Compression on Recognition of Speech in Noise with Temporal Dips.
    Rasetshwane DM; Raybine DA; Kopun JG; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):16-30. PubMed ID: 30461387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.