265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19594516)
1. Haemostatic agents during laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery: what about TachoSil?
Falsaperla M; Autorino R; Puglisi M; Damiano R; Salerno GL; Motta M; Morgia G
BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(2):270-1. PubMed ID: 19594516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemostatics for nephron-sparing surgery.
Minervini A; Siena G; Carini M
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2013 Mar; 10(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 23480082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Haemostatic sealants in nephron-sparing surgery: what surgeons need to know.
Dalpiaz O; Neururer R; Bartsch G; Peschel R
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1502-8. PubMed ID: 18990159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study.
Siemer S; Lahme S; Altziebler S; Machtens S; Strohmaier W; Wechsel HW; Goebell P; Schmeller N; Oberneder R; Stolzenburg JU; Becker H; Lüftenegger W; Tetens V; Van Poppel H
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1156-63. PubMed ID: 17467884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of Tachosil as hemostatic sealant in nephron sparing surgery for Wilms tumor: preliminary observations.
Mele E; Ceccanti S; Schiavetti A; Bosco S; Masselli G; Cozzi DA
J Pediatr Surg; 2013 Mar; 48(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 23480936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Safety and Efficacy of Adjuvant Hemostatic Agents During Laparoscopic Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Comparison of Tachosil and Floseal Versus No Hemostatic Agents.
Tonyali S; Koni A; Yazici S; Bilen CY
Urol J; 2017 Jan; 15(1):21-25. PubMed ID: 29277887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial Comment on: Efficacy and safety of TachoSil as haemostatic treatment versus standard suturing in kidney tumour resection: a randomised prospective study.
Sagalowsky AI
Eur Urol; 2007 Oct; 52(4):1162-3. PubMed ID: 17467888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Editorial comment on: use of haemostatic agents and glues during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 cases.
Klingler C
Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):803. PubMed ID: 17329013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [TachoSil: the value of its use in urologic surgery. An interview with Professor Jacques Bisertes].
Biserte J
J Chir (Paris); 2007; 144(1):82-3. PubMed ID: 17385246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of gelatine matrix-thrombin sealants used during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Nogueira L; Katz D; Pinochet R; Kurta JM; Coleman JA
BJU Int; 2008 Dec; 102(11):1670-4. PubMed ID: 18778355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [An original modification of wedge resection of the kidney in renal cell carcinoma].
Alferov SM; Grishin MA
Urologiia; 2005; (6):23-6. PubMed ID: 16419476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of haemostatic agents and glues during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 cases.
Breda A; Stepanian SV; Lam JS; Liao JC; Gill IS; Colombo JR; Guazzoni G; Stifelman MD; Perry KT; Celia A; Breda G; Fornara P; Jackman SV; Rosales A; Palou J; Grasso M; Pansadoro V; Disanto V; Porpiglia F; Milani C; Abbou CC; Gaston R; Janetschek G; Soomro NA; De la Rosette JJ; Laguna PM; Schulam PG
Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):798-803. PubMed ID: 17329015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Seal properties of TachoSil: in vitro hemodynamic measurements.
Berdajs D; Bürki M; Michelis A; von Segesser LK
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 10(6):910-3. PubMed ID: 20354036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of different hemostatic devices for severe liver bleeding: a randomized controlled animal study.
Takács I; Wegmann J; Horváth S; Ferencz A; Ferencz S; Jávor S; Odermatt E; Rõth E; Weber G
Surg Innov; 2010 Dec; 17(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 20870671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TachoSil surgical patch versus conventional haemostatic fleece material for control of bleeding in cardiovascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial.
Maisano F; Kjaergård HK; Bauernschmitt R; Pavie A; Rábago G; Laskar M; Marstein JP; Falk V
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Oct; 36(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 19595605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of nephron sparing on kidney function and non-oncologic mortality.
Huang WC
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 20816617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does thrombin sealant allow nephron-sparing surgery with no renal artery occlusion? A description of technique and initial results.
Triaca V; Zagha RM; Libertino JA
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1273-5. PubMed ID: 15892815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Nephron-sparing surgery: our experience in open and laparoscopic approach in 254 cases. Editorial comment].
Castillón Vela IT
Arch Esp Urol; 2010; 63(1):70. PubMed ID: 21109715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of nephron-sparing robotic surgery in the management of renal malignancy.
Shapiro E; Benway BM; Wang AJ; Bhayani SB
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 19057221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic Nephron-sparing Surgery for Metanephric Adenoma in Children: A Report of 2 Cases.
Ozden E; Yagiz B; Atac F; Cetin H; Bostanci Y; Yakupoglu YK; Sarikaya S
Urology; 2015 Jul; 86(1):165-7. PubMed ID: 26142601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
