These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19595370)
21. Attitudes toward medical and genetic confidentiality in the Saudi research biobank: An exploratory survey. Alahmad G; Hifnawy T; Abbasi B; Dierickx K Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():84-90. PubMed ID: 26806715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. Harle CA; Golembiewski EH; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Mainous AG; Moseley RE J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Jul; 26(7):620-629. PubMed ID: 30938751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Paediatric biobanks: opinions, feelings and attitudes of parents towards the specimen donation of their sick children to a hypothetical biobank. Salvaterra E; Locatelli F; Strazzer S; Borgatti R; D''angelo G; Lenzi L Pathobiology; 2014; 81(5-6):304-308. PubMed ID: 25792219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A proposed approach to informed consent for biobanks in China. Liu M; Hu Q Bioethics; 2014 May; 28(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 22762502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers. Whitley EA; Kanellopoulou N; Kaye J Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):232-42. PubMed ID: 22722687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Kettis-Lindblad A; Ring L; Viberth E; Hansson MG Scand J Public Health; 2007; 35(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 17454918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differentiating and evaluating common good and public good: making implicit assumptions explicit in the contexts of consent and duty to participate. Bialobrzeski A; Ried J; Dabrock P Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 22722692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Native Hawaiian preferences for informed consent and disclosure of results from research using stored biological specimens. Fong M; Braun KL; Chang RM Pac Health Dialog; 2004 Sep; 11(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 16281693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK. Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. 'It is an entrustment': Broad consent for genomic research and biobanks in sub-Saharan Africa. Tindana P; Molyneux S; Bull S; Parker M Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 29063669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biobank Participants' Attitudes Toward Data Sharing and Privacy: The Role of Trust in Reducing Perceived Risks. Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schwartz PH J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2022; 17(1-2):167-176. PubMed ID: 34779299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research. Allen J; McNamara B Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Survey of Scientist and Policy Makers' Attitudes Toward Research on Stored Human Biological Materials in Sri Lanka. Dissanayake VH; Sumathipala DS; Kariyawasam UG; Jayamanne JM; Nisansala PK; Lie R Dev World Bioeth; 2015 Dec; 15(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 25280225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Platt J; Bollinger J; Dvoskin R; Kardia SL; Kaufman D Genet Med; 2014 Jan; 16(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 23660530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "My Blood, You Know, My Biology Being out There…": Consent and Participant Control of Biological Samples. Passmore SR; Gerbitz A; Hancock GR; Evans L; Green-Harris G; Edwards DF; Jackson T; Thomas SB J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2024 Feb; 19(1-2):3-15. PubMed ID: 38192107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Researchers' Perspectives Regarding Ethical Issues of Biobank Research in the Arab Region. Ibrahim ME; Adarmouch L; Elgamri A; Abd ElHafeez S; Mohammed Z; Abdelgawad F; Elsebaie EH; Abdelhafiz AS; Gamel E; El Rhazi K; Abdelnaby A; Ahram M; Silverman H Biopreserv Biobank; 2024 Apr; 22(2):98-109. PubMed ID: 36951637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimens. Page SA; Manhas KP; Muruve DA BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 27527514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Impact of non-welfare interests on willingness to donate to biobanks: an experimental survey. Gornick MC; Ryan KA; Kim SY J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Oct; 9(4):22-33. PubMed ID: 25747294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Alternatives of informed consent for storage and use of human biological material for research purposes: Brazilian regulation. Marodin G; França PH; Salgueiro JB; Motta ML; Tannous GS; Lopes AG Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 23279324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The right to withdraw consent to research on biobank samples. Helgesson G; Johnsson L Med Health Care Philos; 2005; 8(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16283494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]