BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19595499)

  • 1. Does an energy efficiency label alter consumers' purchasing decisions? A latent class approach based on a stated choice experiment in Shanghai.
    Shen J; Saijo T
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Aug; 90(11):3561-73. PubMed ID: 19595499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emerging trends in Chinese healthcare: the impact of a rising middle class.
    Chang J; Wood D; Xiaofeng J; Gifford B
    World Hosp Health Serv; 2008; 44(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 19370831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nutrition labels in bar graph format deemed most useful for consumer purchase decisions using adaptive conjoint analysis.
    Geiger CJ; Wyse BW; Parent CR; Hansen RG
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1991 Jul; 91(7):800-7. PubMed ID: 2071795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of information about animal welfare on consumer willingness to pay for yogurt.
    Napolitano F; Pacelli C; Girolami A; Braghieri A
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Mar; 91(3):910-7. PubMed ID: 18292246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China.
    Huang J; Qiu H; Bai J; Pray C
    Appetite; 2006 Mar; 46(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16469414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Food safety and consumer willingness to pay for certified traceable food in China.
    Xu L; Wu L
    J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Jun; 90(8):1368-73. PubMed ID: 20474057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumers' use of written product information.
    Wiese BS; Sauer J; Rüttinger B
    Ergonomics; 2004 Sep; 47(11):1180-94. PubMed ID: 15370855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention mediates the effect of nutrition label information on consumers' choice. Evidence from a choice experiment involving eye-tracking.
    Bialkova S; Grunert KG; Juhl HJ; Wasowicz-Kirylo G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; van Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2014 May; 76():66-75. PubMed ID: 24503332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Willingness to pay for reducing fatal risk by improving air quality: a contingent valuation study in Chongqing, China.
    Wang H; Mullahy J
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Aug; 367(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 16580710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Food with Information on Animal Welfare, Lean Meat Essence Detection, and Traceability.
    Xu L; Yang X; Wu L; Chen X; Chen L; Tsai FS
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31561621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do content and format affect older consumers' use of comparative information in a Medicare health plan choice? Results from a controlled experiment.
    Uhrig JD; Harris-Kojetin L; Bann C; Kuo TM
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Dec; 63(6):701-18. PubMed ID: 17099122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes towards honey among Italian consumers: A choice experiment approach.
    Cosmina M; Gallenti G; Marangon F; Troiano S
    Appetite; 2016 Apr; 99():52-58. PubMed ID: 26719101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between reliability and size of willingness-to-pay values: a qualitative insight.
    Smith RD
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):211-6. PubMed ID: 16929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Labeling of nanotechnology consumer products can influence risk and benefit perceptions.
    Siegrist M; Keller C
    Risk Anal; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1762-9. PubMed ID: 22084863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Credence quality coordination and consumers' willingness-to-pay for certified halal labelled meat.
    Verbeke W; Rutsaert P; Bonne K; Vermeir I
    Meat Sci; 2013 Dec; 95(4):790-7. PubMed ID: 23688800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reprint of "Attitudes towards honey among Italian consumers: A choice experiment approach".
    Cosmina M; Gallenti G; Marangon F; Troiano S
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():110-6. PubMed ID: 27561231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surveys suck: Consumer preferences when purchasing genetically engineered foods.
    Powell DA
    GM Crops Food; 2013; 4(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 24281042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.
    Maddala T; Phillips KA; Reed Johnson F
    Health Econ; 2003 Dec; 12(12):1035-47. PubMed ID: 14673812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
    Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.