These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19596426)

  • 1. Dogs discriminate between barks: the effect of context and identity of the caller.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):198-201. PubMed ID: 19596426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can humans discriminate between dogs on the base of the acoustic parameters of barks?
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jul; 73(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 16678361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach.
    Molnár C; Kaplan F; Roy P; Pachet F; Pongrácz P; Dóka A; Miklósi A
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 18197442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations.
    Pongrácz P; Molnár C; Miklósi A; Csányi V
    J Comp Psychol; 2005 May; 119(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 15982157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing with ears: Sightless humans' perception of dog bark provides a test for structural rules in vocal communication.
    Molnár C; Pongrácz P; Miklósi A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):1004-13. PubMed ID: 19760535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new perspective on barking in dogs (Canis familiaris).
    Yin S
    J Comp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 116(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 12083615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of experience and context on 50-kHz vocalizations in rats.
    Wöhr M; Houx B; Schwarting RK; Spruijt B
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Mar; 93(4-5):766-76. PubMed ID: 18191963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Salience of caller identity in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) coos and screams: perceptual experiments with human (Homo sapiens) listeners.
    Owren MJ; Rendall D
    J Comp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 117(4):380-90. PubMed ID: 14717639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of auditory distractors on song discrimination in male canaries (Serinus canaria).
    Appeltants D; Gentner TQ; Hulse SH; Balthazart J; Ball GF
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jun; 69(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 15896531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recognition of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) noisy screams: evidence from conspecifics and human listeners.
    Fugate JM; Gouzoules H; Nygaard LC
    Am J Primatol; 2008 Jun; 70(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 18318042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination between host songs by brood parasitic brown-headed cowbirds ( Molothrus ater).
    Hauber ME; Pearson HE; Reh A; Merges A
    Anim Cogn; 2002 Sep; 5(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 12357285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The harmonic-to-noise ratio applied to dog barks.
    Riede T; Herzel H; Hammerschmidt K; Brunnberg L; Tembrock G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2191-7. PubMed ID: 11681395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing supervised learning methods for classifying sex, age, context and individual Mudi dogs from barking.
    Larrañaga A; Bielza C; Pongrácz P; Faragó T; Bálint A; Larrañaga P
    Anim Cogn; 2015 Mar; 18(2):405-21. PubMed ID: 25308549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infants' intermodal perception of canine (Canis familairis) facial expressions and vocalizations.
    Flom R; Whipple H; Hyde D
    Dev Psychol; 2009 Jul; 45(4):1143-51. PubMed ID: 19586184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The disassociation of visual and acoustic conspecific cues decreases discrimination by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19685973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barking and mobbing.
    Lord K; Feinstein M; Coppinger R
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jul; 81(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 19520235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are rats predisposed to learn 22 kHz calls as danger-predicting signals?
    Endres T; Widmann K; Fendt M
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 185(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 17714801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are temporal features crucial acoustic cues in dog vocal recognition?
    Siniscalchi M; Lusito R; Sasso R; Quaranta A
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Sep; 15(5):815-21. PubMed ID: 22544303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) distinguish between different scream types: evidence from a playback study.
    Slocombe KE; Townsend SW; Zuberbühler K
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):441-9. PubMed ID: 19112583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vocal identity and species recognition in male Australian sea lions, Neophoca cinerea.
    Gwilliam J; Charrier I; Harcourt RG
    J Exp Biol; 2008 Jul; 211(Pt 14):2288-95. PubMed ID: 18587123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.