These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19596569)

  • 21. Numerical simulation of scaling-up for AEC-MBRs regarding membrane module configurations and cyclic aeration modes.
    Yang M; Liu M; Yu D; Zheng J; Wu Z; Zhao S; Chang J; Wei Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Dec; 245(Pt A):933-943. PubMed ID: 28938512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Knowledge-based system for automatic MBR control.
    Comas J; Meabe E; Sancho L; Ferrero G; Sipma J; Monclús H; Rodriguez-Roda I
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(12):2829-36. PubMed ID: 21123912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hydrodynamic effects of air sparging on hollow fiber membranes in a bubble column reactor.
    Xia L; Law AW; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2013 Jul; 47(11):3762-72. PubMed ID: 23726713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors.
    Bilad MR; Mezohegyi G; Declerck P; Vankelecom IF
    Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 22082526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Change in the fouling propensity of sludge in membrane bioreactors (MBR) in relation to the accumulation of biopolymer clusters.
    Sun FY; Wang XM; Li XY
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4718-25. PubMed ID: 21316942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
    Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characteristics of membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor under sub-critical flux operation.
    Su YC; Huang CP; Pan JR; Lee HC
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(4):601-5. PubMed ID: 18360002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fouling control in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Judd S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):27-34. PubMed ID: 16003958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison between novel vibrating ceramic MBR and conventional air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment: Performance, fouling control and energy consumption.
    Wang C; Ng TCA; Ng HY
    Water Res; 2021 Sep; 203():117521. PubMed ID: 34391023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental evidence for osmotic pressure-induced fouling in a membrane bioreactor.
    Lin H; Zhang M; Wang F; He Y; Chen J; Hong H; Wang A; Yu H
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Apr; 158():119-26. PubMed ID: 24594671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Seasonal variation in membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater.
    Miyoshi T; Tsuyuhara T; Ogyu R; Kimura K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Dec; 43(20):5109-18. PubMed ID: 19767055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of organic and inorganic flocculants on physical-chemical properties of biomass and membrane-fouling rate.
    Ji J; Qiu J; Wai N; Wong FS; Li Y
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1627-35. PubMed ID: 19954810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Osmotic pressure effect on membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor and its experimental verification.
    Chen J; Zhang M; Wang A; Lin H; Hong H; Lu X
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Dec; 125():97-101. PubMed ID: 23026319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Thermophilic sidestream anaerobic membrane bioreactors: the shear rate dilemma.
    Jeison D; Telkamp P; van Lier JB
    Water Environ Res; 2009 Nov; 81(11):2372-80. PubMed ID: 19957769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Filtration characteristics and mechanism of membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment].
    Lin HJ; Lu XF; Duan W; Shen F
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Dec; 27(12):2511-7. PubMed ID: 17304850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect and mechanism of reduced membrane bioreactor fouling by powdered activated carbon.
    Zhang Y; Wang X; Ye H; Zhou L; Zhao Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 83(5):1005-1016. PubMed ID: 33724932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of fouling characteristics in different pore-sized submerged ceramic membrane bioreactors.
    Jin L; Ong SL; Ng HY
    Water Res; 2010 Dec; 44(20):5907-18. PubMed ID: 20709347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge.
    Ratkovich N; Chan CC; Bentzen TR; Rasmussen MR
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):2061-70. PubMed ID: 22592479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Engineering of an MBR supernatant fouling layer by fine particles addition: a possible way to control cake compressibility.
    Teychene B; Guigui C; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2011 Feb; 45(5):2060-72. PubMed ID: 21232780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Integrating activated sludge floc size information in MBR fouling modeling.
    Cao TA; Van De Staey G; Smets IY
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(7):1073-80. PubMed ID: 25860711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.