BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19596594)

  • 1. Dual energy versus single energy MDCT: measurement of radiation dose using adult abdominal imaging protocols.
    Ho LM; Yoshizumi TT; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC; Marin D; Toncheva G; Schindera ST
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):1400-7. PubMed ID: 19596594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols.
    Hurwitz LM; Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Lowry C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(4):544-9. PubMed ID: 17882029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Second-generation dual-energy computed tomography of the abdomen: radiation dose comparison with 64- and 128-row single-energy acquisition.
    De Cecco CN; Darnell A; Macías N; Ayuso JR; Rodríguez S; Rimola J; Pagés M; García-Criado Á; Rengo M; Muscogiuri G; Laghi A; Ayuso C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 23863529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early first-trimester fetal radiation dose estimation in 16-MDCT without and with automated tube current modulation.
    Jaffe TA; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva GI; Nguyen G; Hurwitz LM; Nelson RC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):860-4. PubMed ID: 18356429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
    Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns.
    Francone M; Napoli A; Carbone I; Cavacece M; Nardis PG; Lanciotti K; Visconti S; Bertoletti L; Di Castro E; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):31-46. PubMed ID: 17310293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Female breast, lung, and pelvic organ radiation from dose-reduced 64-MDCT thoracic examination protocols: a phantom study.
    Litmanovich D; Tack D; Lin PJ; Boiselle PM; Raptopoulos V; Bankier AA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):929-34. PubMed ID: 21940581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-source CT angiography in aortic stent grafting: An in vitro aorta phantom study of image noise and radiation dose.
    Sun Z; Ng C
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jul; 17(7):884-93. PubMed ID: 20447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric cardiac-gated CT angiography: assessment of radiation dose.
    Hollingsworth CL; Yoshizumi TT; Frush DP; Chan FP; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Lowry CR; Hurwitz LM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 17579144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
    Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
    Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting Intracranial Hemorrhage Using Automatic Tube Current Modulation With Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction in Unenhanced Head Single- and Dual-Energy Dual-Source CT.
    Scholtz JE; Wichmann JL; Bennett DW; Leithner D; Bauer RW; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1089-1096. PubMed ID: 28245141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
    Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].
    Koller F; Roth J
    Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 17203442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose.
    DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; Zankl M; Angel E; McNitt-Gray MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2583-97. PubMed ID: 17440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.