213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19596785)
1. The concerted action of Msh2 and UNG stimulates somatic hypermutation at A . T base pairs.
Frieder D; Larijani M; Collins C; Shulman M; Martin A
Mol Cell Biol; 2009 Sep; 29(18):5148-57. PubMed ID: 19596785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Competitive repair pathways in immunoglobulin gene hypermutation.
Reynaud CA; Delbos F; Faili A; Guéranger Q; Aoufouchi S; Weill JC
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2009 Mar; 364(1517):613-9. PubMed ID: 19010770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AID-associated DNA repair pathways regulate malignant transformation in a murine model of BCL6-driven diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Gu X; Booth CJ; Liu Z; Strout MP
Blood; 2016 Jan; 127(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 26385350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of Ig gene hypermutation in Ung(-/-)Polh(-/-) mice suggests that UNG and A:T mutagenesis pathway target different U:G lesions.
Li S; Zhao Y; Wang JY
Mol Immunol; 2013 Mar; 53(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 22960197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular mechanisms of antibody somatic hypermutation.
Di Noia JM; Neuberger MS
Annu Rev Biochem; 2007; 76():1-22. PubMed ID: 17328676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pms2 and uracil-DNA glycosylases act jointly in the mismatch repair pathway to generate Ig gene mutations at A-T base pairs.
Girelli Zubani G; Zivojnovic M; De Smet A; Albagli-Curiel O; Huetz F; Weill JC; Reynaud CA; Storck S
J Exp Med; 2017 Apr; 214(4):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 28283534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Known components of the immunoglobulin A:T mutational machinery are intact in Burkitt lymphoma cell lines with G:C bias.
Xiao Z; Ray M; Jiang C; Clark AB; Rogozin IB; Diaz M
Mol Immunol; 2007 Apr; 44(10):2659-66. PubMed ID: 17240451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Somatic hypermutation at A/T-rich oligonucleotide substrates shows different strand polarities in Ung-deficient or -proficient backgrounds.
Zivojnovic M; Delbos F; Girelli Zubani G; Julé A; Alcais A; Weill JC; Reynaud CA; Storck S
Mol Cell Biol; 2014 Jun; 34(12):2176-87. PubMed ID: 24710273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AID Phosphorylation Regulates Mismatch Repair-Dependent Class Switch Recombination and Affinity Maturation.
Choi JE; Matthews AJ; Michel G; Vuong BQ
J Immunol; 2020 Jan; 204(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31757865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DNA polymerase eta is the sole contributor of A/T modifications during immunoglobulin gene hypermutation in the mouse.
Delbos F; Aoufouchi S; Faili A; Weill JC; Reynaud CA
J Exp Med; 2007 Jan; 204(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17190840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The in vivo pattern of AID targeting to immunoglobulin switch regions deduced from mutation spectra in msh2-/- ung-/- mice.
Xue K; Rada C; Neuberger MS
J Exp Med; 2006 Sep; 203(9):2085-94. PubMed ID: 16894013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in Msh6(-/-)Ung(-/-) double-knockout mice.
Shen HM; Tanaka A; Bozek G; Nicolae D; Storb U
J Immunol; 2006 Oct; 177(8):5386-92. PubMed ID: 17015724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differential expression of APE1 and APE2 in germinal centers promotes error-prone repair and A:T mutations during somatic hypermutation.
Stavnezer J; Linehan EK; Thompson MR; Habboub G; Ucher AJ; Kadungure T; Tsuchimoto D; Nakabeppu Y; Schrader CE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jun; 111(25):9217-22. PubMed ID: 24927551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uracil excision by endogenous SMUG1 glycosylase promotes efficient Ig class switching and impacts on A:T substitutions during somatic mutation.
Dingler FA; Kemmerich K; Neuberger MS; Rada C
Eur J Immunol; 2014 Jul; 44(7):1925-35. PubMed ID: 24771041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mismatch recognition and uracil excision provide complementary paths to both Ig switching and the A/T-focused phase of somatic mutation.
Rada C; Di Noia JM; Neuberger MS
Mol Cell; 2004 Oct; 16(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 15494304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Somatic hypermutation at A.T pairs: polymerase error versus dUTP incorporation.
Neuberger MS; Di Noia JM; Beale RC; Williams GT; Yang Z; Rada C
Nat Rev Immunol; 2005 Feb; 5(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 15688043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. UNG shapes the specificity of AID-induced somatic hypermutation.
Pérez-Durán P; Belver L; de Yébenes VG; Delgado P; Pisano DG; Ramiro AR
J Exp Med; 2012 Jul; 209(7):1379-89. PubMed ID: 22665573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strand-biased spreading of mutations during somatic hypermutation.
Unniraman S; Schatz DG
Science; 2007 Aug; 317(5842):1227-30. PubMed ID: 17761884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. AID recruits UNG and Msh2 to Ig switch regions dependent upon the AID C terminus [corrected].
Ranjit S; Khair L; Linehan EK; Ucher AJ; Chakrabarti M; Schrader CE; Stavnezer J
J Immunol; 2011 Sep; 187(5):2464-75. PubMed ID: 21804017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice.
Rada C; Williams GT; Nilsen H; Barnes DE; Lindahl T; Neuberger MS
Curr Biol; 2002 Oct; 12(20):1748-55. PubMed ID: 12401169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
