152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1959787)
1. Histological differences between colposcopic-directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone (LETZ): a cause for concern.
Chappatte OA; Byrne DL; Raju KS; Nayagam M; Kenney A
Gynecol Oncol; 1991 Oct; 43(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1959787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of success rate and complications of contour-loop excision of the transformation zone (C-LETZ) with cold knife conization (CKC) in high grade lesion (HGL) from colposcopic impression.
Janthanaphan M; Wootipoom V; Tangsinmunkong K; Liabsuetrakul T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92(12):1573-9. PubMed ID: 20043556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of colposcopically directed, four-quadrant cervical biopsy by the colposcopy trainee.
Homesley HD; Jobson VW; Reish RL
J Reprod Med; 1984 May; 29(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 6726700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chia KV; Fayle RJ; Sobowale OA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Aug; 33(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 8304896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How can the incidence of negative specimens resulting from large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone (LLETZ) be reduced? An analysis of negative LLETZ specimens and development of a predictive model.
Howells RE; O'Mahony F; Tucker H; Millinship J; Jones PW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2000 Sep; 107(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 11002948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Colposcopically directed biopsy and loop excision of the transformation zone. Comparison of histologic findings.
Ang MS; Kaufman RH; Adam E; Riddle G; Irwin JF; Reeves KO; Simon TL
J Reprod Med; 1995 Mar; 40(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 7776297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidence of dysplasia, carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma in colposcopic findings of atypical re-epithelization zone (A.R.Z.) and atypical transformation zone (A.T.Z.).
De Punzio C; Fiore N; Vecoli LE; Rosi F; Teti G
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1985; 6(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 3971996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. C-LETZ versus large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized controlled trial.
Boonlikit S; Thitisagulwong S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1173-9. PubMed ID: 22710953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrepancy between colposcopy, punch biopsy and final histology of cone specimen: a prospective study.
Petousis S; Christidis P; Margioula-Siarkou C; Sparangis N; Athanasiadis A; Kalogiannidis I
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1271-1275. PubMed ID: 29442140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy.
LaPolla JP; O'Neill C; Wetrich D
J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 3361522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis and cervical pathology: Siriraj hospital experience.
Tatiyachonwiphut M; Jaishuen A; Sangkarat S; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Inthasorn P; Viriyapak B; Warnnissorn M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(1):423-6. PubMed ID: 24528068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should punch biopsies be used when high-grade disease is suspected at initial colposcopic assessment? A prospective study.
Byrom J; Douce G; Jones PW; Tucker H; Millinship J; Dhar K; Redman CW
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006; 16(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 16445640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation between colposcopically directed biopsy and cervical loop excision.
Massad LS; Halperin CJ; Bitterman P
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 8774646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Key Determinants of the Value of Random Cervical Biopsy at Colposcopy.
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Burchette RJ; Wu R; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2019 Oct; 23(4):241-247. PubMed ID: 31592970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital imaging colposcopy, image analysis and quantification of the colposcopic image.
Shafi MI; Dunn JA; Chenoy R; Buxton EJ; Williams C; Luesley DM
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Mar; 101(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 8193099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
