200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19598011)
1. Physiological effects of the TASER C2 conducted energy weapon.
Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Klages CM
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(3):189-98. PubMed ID: 19598011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acute effects of an alternative electronic-control-device waveform in swine.
Jauchem J; Beason CW; Cook MC
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2009; 5(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 19330471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Blood factors of Sus scrofa following a series of three TASER electronic control device exposures.
Jauchem JR; Cook MC; Beason CW
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):166-70. PubMed ID: 17630236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures.
Jauchem JR; Sherry CJ; Fines DA; Cook MC
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Aug; 161(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 16289999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival of anesthetized Sus scrofa after cycling (7-second on/3-second off) exposures to an electronic control device for 3 minutes.
Jauchem JR; Seaman RL; Fines DA
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2011 Jun; 32(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 21464698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of a TASER® conducted energy weapon on the circulating red-blood-cell population and other factors in Sus scrofa.
Jauchem JR; Bernhard JA; Cerna CZ; Lim TY; Seaman RL; Tarango M
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 23543463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?
Jauchem JR
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa.
Jauchem JR
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S229-33. PubMed ID: 21198623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices).
Jauchem JR
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Mar; 55(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 20141556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures.
Miller CD
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(1):e17-8; author reply e19. PubMed ID: 17239551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?
Jauchem JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23605975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of continuous application of the TASER X26 waveform on Sus scrofa.
Jenkins DM; Murray WB; Kennett MJ; Hughes EL; Werner JR
J Forensic Sci; 2013 May; 58(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 23489132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards.
Panescu D; Nerheim M; Kroll M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5342-7. PubMed ID: 24110943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults.
Dawes DM; Ho JD; Johnson MA; Lundin E; Janchar TA; Miner JR
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Apr; 176(2-3):253-7. PubMed ID: 17983716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulse variations of a conducted energy weapon (similar to the TASER X26 device): effects on muscle contraction and threshold for ventricular fibrillation*.
Beason CW; Jauchem JR; Clark CD; Parker JE; Fines DA
J Forensic Sci; 2009 Sep; 54(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 19737245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
Comeaux JA; Jauchem JR; Cox DD; Crane CC; D'Andrea JA
J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of two conducted electrical weapons and two probe designs using a swine comparative cardiac safety model.
Dawes DM; Ho JD; Moore JC; Miner JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2013 Sep; 9(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 23543462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prolonged TASER use on exhausted humans does not worsen markers of acidosis.
Ho JD; Dawes DM; Bultman LL; Moscati RM; Janchar TA; Miner JR
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 May; 27(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 19555610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Human Electro-Muscular Incapacitation (HEMI) Devices on Cardiovascular Changes in Anesthetized Swine as Measured by Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE).
Werner JR; Murray WB; Kennett MJ; Jenkins DM; Liszka E; Hughes EL
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Mar; 64(2):446-453. PubMed ID: 29758093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repeated or long-duration TASER electronic control device exposures: acidemia and lack of respiration.
Jauchem JR
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2010 Mar; 6(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 19936976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
