These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19601944)

  • 1. Long-term role of external breast prostheses after total mastectomy.
    Glaus SW; Carlson GW
    Breast J; 2009; 15(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 19601944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Problems in wearing external prosthesis after mastectomy and patient's desire for breast reconstruction.
    Korvenoja ML; Smitten K; Asko-Seljavaara S
    Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1998; 87(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 9598227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial experience of intramammary prostheses in breast conservation surgery.
    Elton C; Jones SE; Jones PA
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1999 Apr; 25(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 10218454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Women's satisfaction with their breast prosthesis: what determines a quality prosthesis?
    Livingston PM; White VM; Roberts SB; Pritchard E; Hayman J; Gibbs A; Hill DJ
    Eval Rev; 2005 Feb; 29(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 15604120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External breast prostheses in post-mastectomy care: women's qualitative accounts.
    Gallagher P; Buckmaster A; O'Carroll S; Kiernan G; Geraghty J
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2010 Jan; 19(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 19708927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conventional or adhesive external breast prosthesis? A prospective study of the patients' preference after mastectomy.
    Thijs-Boer FM; Thijs JT; van de Wiel HB
    Cancer Nurs; 2001 Jun; 24(3):227-30. PubMed ID: 11409067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Body image, self-concept, and self-esteem in women who had a mastectomy and either wore an external breast prosthesis or had breast reconstruction and women who had not experienced mastectomy.
    Reaby LL; Hort LK; Vandervord J
    Health Care Women Int; 1994; 15(5):361-75. PubMed ID: 8002421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience.
    Yueh JH; Slavin SA; Bar-Meir ED; Merali HS; Houlihan MJ; Gautam S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Feb; 208(2):246-54. PubMed ID: 19228537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term cosmetic outcome after breast implantation.
    Hölmich LR; Breiting VB; Fryzek JP; Brandt B; Wolthers MS; Kjøller K; McLaughlin JK; Friis S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Dec; 59(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 18046137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Update on breast reconstruction in breast cancer.
    Reavey P; McCarthy CM
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Feb; 20(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18197008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A woman's influence to choose mastectomy as treatment for breast cancer.
    Fancher TT; Palesty JA; Thomas R; Healy T; Fancher JM; Ng C; Dudrick SJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 May; 153(1):128-31. PubMed ID: 18952229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Access to breast prostheses via a government-funded service in Victoria, Australia. Experience of women and service providers.
    Livingston PM; White V; Roberts S; Pritchard E; Gibbs A; Hill DJ
    Eval Rev; 2003 Oct; 27(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 14531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experiences in the provision, fitting and supply of external breast prostheses: findings from a national survey.
    Gallagher P; Buckmaster A; O'Carroll S; Kiernan G; Geraghty J
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2009 Nov; 18(6):556-68. PubMed ID: 19489989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: a comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses.
    Panettiere P; Marchetti L; Accorsi D
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(5):482-9. PubMed ID: 17399656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presenting all the choices: teaching women about breast prosthetics.
    Kiefer CG
    Medscape Womens Health; 2001 Oct; 6(5):4. PubMed ID: 11721686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation.
    Yueh JH; Houlihan MJ; Slavin SA; Lee BT; Pories SE; Morris DJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):586-90. PubMed ID: 19387167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy?
    Collins ED; Moore CP; Clay KF; Kearing SA; O'Connor AM; Llewellyn-Thomas HA; Barth RJ; Sepucha KR
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Feb; 27(4):519-25. PubMed ID: 19114703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast reconstruction after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Eldor L; Spiegel A
    Breast J; 2009; 15 Suppl 1():S81-9. PubMed ID: 19775335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variables that affect the satisfaction of Brazilian women with external breast prostheses after mastectomy.
    Borghesan DH; Gravena AA; Lopes TC; Brischiliari SC; de Oliveira Demitto M; Dell Agnolo CM; de Barros Carvalho MD; Pelloso SM
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(22):9631-4. PubMed ID: 25520080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The brassiere shop: a front line of assistance to the mastectomy patient.
    Smoot EC; Silverman JJ; Cohen IK
    Ann Plast Surg; 1979 Nov; 3(5):430-2. PubMed ID: 543669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.