These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1960232)

  • 1. An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments.
    Ritz L; Hefti AF; Rateitschak KH
    J Clin Periodontol; 1991 Oct; 18(9):643-7. PubMed ID: 1960232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subgingival debridement with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments and assessment of substance removal on extracted teeth.
    Rühling A; Bernhardt O; Kocher T
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Jun; 36(6):446-52. PubMed ID: 15954250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of root substance with the Vector-system compared with conventional debridement in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Feb; 32(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 15691344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments.
    Jotikasthira NE; Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):560-9. PubMed ID: 1447381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Root surface removal with diamond-coated ultrasonic instruments: an in vitro and SEM study.
    Lavespere JE; Yukna RA; Rice DA; LeBlanc DM
    J Periodontol; 1996 Dec; 67(12):1281-7. PubMed ID: 8997674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An in vitro assessment of the dentine lost during instrumentation using the Periosonic system.
    Rees JS; Addy M; Hughes J
    J Clin Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 26(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 10048644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tooth substance loss resulting from mechanical, sonic and ultrasonic root instrumentation assessed by liquid scintillation.
    Schmidlin PR; Beuchat M; Busslinger A; Lehmann B; Lutz F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1058-66. PubMed ID: 11686828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study.
    Obeid P; Bercy P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study.
    Casarin RC; Ribeiro FV; Sallum AW; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19466233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Calculus removal efficiency and injury potential of vertically oscillating metallic and carbon ultrasonic tips].
    Naef FH; Sener B; Bürgi-Tiedemann C; Schmidlin PR
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(11):1116-23. PubMed ID: 15587598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The diamond-coated sonic scaler tip. Part II: Loss of substance and alteration of root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Kocher T; Plagmann HC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Oct; 17(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 9497737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of manual and ultrasonic instrumentation of cementum surfaces: influence of lateral pressure.
    Gagnot G; Mora F; Poblete MG; Vachey E; Michel JF; Cathelineau G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 15119884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Rüdiger S; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 9552818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Surface changes of enamel, root cementum and fillings after treatment with tooth cleaning instruments].
    Topoll HH; Lange DE; Hügelmyer T; Hannemann D
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):387-90. PubMed ID: 2700726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.
    Petersilka GJ; Draenert M; Mehl A; Hickel R; Flemmig TF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 12795794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.