BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19602338)

  • 1. Longitudinal and axial stability of a cementless metaphyseal versus a fully porous coated cylindrical femoral stem.
    Rivera VR; Parks BG; Boucher HR
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 19602338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cementless femoral design concerns. Rationale for extensive porous coating.
    Nourbash PS; Paprosky WG
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Oct; (355):189-99. PubMed ID: 9917604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Extracorporeally irradiated autograft-prosthetic composite arthroplasty using AML extensively porous-coated stem for proximal femur reconstruction: a clinical analysis of 14 patients.
    Chen CF; Chen WM; Cheng YC; Chiang CC; Huang CK; Chen TH
    J Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 100(5):418-22. PubMed ID: 19653257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The mid-term results of a dual offset uncemented stem for total hip arthroplasty.
    Danesh-Clough T; Bourne RB; Rorabeck CH; McCalden R
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Feb; 22(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 17275633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can the rasp be used to predict intra-operatively the primary stability that can be achieved by press-fitting the stem in cementless hip arthroplasty?
    Varini E; Cristofolini L; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 May; 23(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 18068878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results.
    Paprosky WG; Burnett RS
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2002 Aug; 31(8):471-4. PubMed ID: 12216970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extensively coated cementless femoral components in revision total hip arthoplasty: an update.
    Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
    Surg Technol Int; 2005; 14():265-74. PubMed ID: 16525982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cementless S-ROM femoral component: effect of stem length on stability after extended proximal femoral osteotomy.
    Bhagia UT; Corpe RS; Steflik DE; Young TR; Schnars J
    J South Orthop Assoc; 2001; 10(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 12132846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bending stiffness, torsional stability, and insertion force of cementless femoral stems.
    Incavo SJ; Johnson CC; Churchill DL; Beynnon BD
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 Apr; 30(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 11334454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of femoral stem geometry, material and extent of porous coating on bone ingrowth and atrophy in cementless total hip arthroplasty: an iterative finite element model.
    Folgado J; Fernandes PR; Jacobs CR; Pellegrini VD
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Apr; 12(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 19242833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of stem size on clinical outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty with cementless extensively porous-coated femoral components.
    Engh CA; Mohan V; Nagowski JP; Sychterz Terefenko CJ; Engh CA
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 18534449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary stability of a robodoc implanted anatomical stem versus manual implantation.
    Nogler M; Polikeit A; Wimmer C; Brückner A; Ferguson SJ; Krismer M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Feb; 19(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 14967574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in stability and bone remodeling between a customized uncemented hydroxyapatite coated and a standard cemented femoral stem A randomized study with use of radiostereometry and bone densitometry.
    Grant P; Aamodt A; Falch JA; Nordsletten L
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1280-5. PubMed ID: 15925474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty at Duke: 18- to 24-year follow-up.
    Ferrell MS; Browne JA; Attarian DE; Cook C; Bolognesi MP
    J Surg Orthop Adv; 2009; 18(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 19843441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydroxyapatite-coated tapered cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty.
    Chambers B; St Clair SF; Froimson MI
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Jun; 22(4 Suppl 1):71-4. PubMed ID: 17570282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experimental study on the stability of cementless porous coated endoprosthesis].
    Otani T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Oct; 66(10):1031-42. PubMed ID: 1460374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of cementless hip stems on femoral cortical strain pattern depending on their extent of porous coating.
    Ellenrieder M; Steinhauser E; Bader R; Mittelmeier W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2012 Apr; 57(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 22505495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cementless femoral stem revisited.
    Macari GS; Kassim RA; Yoon P; Saleh KJ
    J South Orthop Assoc; 2003; 12(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 12882246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cementless stem fixation and primary stability under physiological-like loads in vitro.
    Heller MO; Kassi JP; Perka C; Duda GN
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Dec; 50(12):394-9. PubMed ID: 16429942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.