These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19602717)
1. Direct-to-consumer/patient advertising of genetic testing: a position statement of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology. Ameer B; Krivoy N J Clin Pharmacol; 2009 Aug; 49(8):886-8. PubMed ID: 19602717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Practice guidelines for pharmacotherapy specialists. A position statement of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. The ACCP Clinical Practice Affairs Committee, 1989-1990. Pharmacotherapy; 1990; 10(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 2388878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States. Hudson K; Javitt G; Burke W; Byers P; Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1392-5. PubMed ID: 18055737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. ASHP's position on direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drug products. Pierpaoli PG Am J Hosp Pharm; 1986 Jul; 43(7):1763-5. PubMed ID: 3752120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A commentary on the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics position statement on dietary supplement safety and regulation. Marcus DM Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2005 Aug; 78(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 16084845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Molecular Therapeutics Section of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Waldman SA; Terzic A Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1999 Oct; 66(4):336-7. PubMed ID: 10546916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Extending worldwide clinical pharmacology education through a pricing approach. Ameer B J Clin Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 45(9):982-6. PubMed ID: 16100292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. American College of Clinical Pharmacology position statement on the use of microdosing in the drug development process. Bertino JS; Greenberg HE; Reed MD; J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Apr; 47(4):418-22. PubMed ID: 17389550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct-to-consumer advertising: impact on prescribing. Child Health Alert; 2005 Jun; 24():5-6. PubMed ID: 16134243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. There must be more to health promotion than slick advertising campaigns. Rose J Nurs Times; 1999 Nov 17-23; 95(46):21. PubMed ID: 11096873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are doctors prepared for direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests? Mennuti M Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 111(4):991, author reply 991. PubMed ID: 18378761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing a marketing plan for the New Jersey Chapter of the Society for Public Health Education. Blonna R; Broadbent L; King P Health Educ Q; 1991; 18(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 2055774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics position statement on the public health risks of ephedra. Hollister AS; Kearns GL Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2003 Nov; 74(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 14586380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Report of the 2010 APhA House of Delegates: actions of the legislative body of the American Pharmacists Association. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2010; 50(4):471-2. PubMed ID: 20621862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Library displays spread the word about midwives. Wallace KE Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (70):28-9. PubMed ID: 15310121 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Concerning the Case of United States v. American Pharmaceutical Association and Michigan state Pharmaceutical Association Civil No. G75-558, CA5, W.D. Michigan. Apple WS Am Pharm; 1983 Aug; NS23(8):54-6. PubMed ID: 6624641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Are doctors prepared for direct-to-consumer advertising of genetics tests? Tracy EE Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Dec; 110(6):1389-91. PubMed ID: 18055736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]