These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1960275)

  • 1. McGurk effect in non-English listeners: few visual effects for Japanese subjects hearing Japanese syllables of high auditory intelligibility.
    Sekiyama K; Tohkura Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1797-805. PubMed ID: 1960275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cultural and linguistic factors in audiovisual speech processing: the McGurk effect in Chinese subjects.
    Sekiyama K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 9038409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-modal phonetic encoding facilitates the McGurk illusion and phonemic restoration.
    Abbott NT; Shahin AJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Dec; 120(6):2988-3000. PubMed ID: 30303762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of selective attention to auditory and visual speech on the integration of audiovisual speech information.
    Buchan JN; Munhall KG
    Perception; 2011; 40(10):1164-82. PubMed ID: 22308887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal constraints on the McGurk effect.
    Munhall KG; Gribble P; Sacco L; Ward M
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Apr; 58(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 8935896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
    Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the McGurk effect for spoken and sung syllables.
    Quinto L; Thompson WF; Russo FA; Trehub SE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1450-4. PubMed ID: 20675792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of the auditory-visual illusion in speech perception by children with phonological disorders.
    Dodd B; McIntosh B; Erdener D; Burnham D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Jan; 22(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 18092221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audio-visual speech processing in age-related hearing loss: Stronger integration and increased frontal lobe recruitment.
    Rosemann S; Thiel CM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 175():425-437. PubMed ID: 29655940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Age-related hearing loss influences functional connectivity of auditory cortex for the McGurk illusion.
    Rosemann S; Smith D; Dewenter M; Thiel CM
    Cortex; 2020 Aug; 129():266-280. PubMed ID: 32535378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of phonetic context on audio-visual intelligibility of French.
    Benoît C; Mohamadi T; Kandel S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Oct; 37(5):1195-203. PubMed ID: 7823561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.
    Magnotti JF; Basu Mallick D; Feng G; Zhou B; Zhou W; Beauchamp MS
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 233(9):2581-6. PubMed ID: 26041554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
    Brown VA; Hedayati M; Zanger A; Mayn S; Ray L; Dillman-Hasso N; Strand JF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207160. PubMed ID: 30418995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Audio-visual integration in noise: Influence of auditory and visual stimulus degradation on eye movements and perception of the McGurk effect.
    Stacey JE; Howard CJ; Mitra S; Stacey PC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Oct; 82(7):3544-3557. PubMed ID: 32533526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Intermodal timing cues for audio-visual speech recognition].
    Hashimoto M; Kumashiro M
    J UOEH; 2004 Jun; 26(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 15244074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.
    Green KP; Kuhl PK; Meltzoff AN; Stevens EB
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Dec; 50(6):524-36. PubMed ID: 1780200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
    Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The McGurk phenomenon in Italian listeners.
    Bovo R; Ciorba A; Prosser S; Martini A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2009 Aug; 29(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 20161878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.