These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1960278)

  • 1. Gender recognition from speech. Part I: Coarse analysis.
    Wu K; Childers DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1828-40. PubMed ID: 1960278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis.
    Childers DG; Wu K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1841-56. PubMed ID: 1755877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tempo, stress, and vowel reduction in American English.
    Fourakis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1816-27. PubMed ID: 1960277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speaker normalization using cortical strip maps: a neural model for steady-state vowel categorization.
    Ames H; Grossberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3918-36. PubMed ID: 19206817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of steady-state vowels synthesized from the Peterson and Barney measurements.
    Hillenbrand J; Gayvert RT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):668-74. PubMed ID: 8370872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation.
    Yeni-Komshian GH; Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):966-75. PubMed ID: 7288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic pattern recognition of fricative-vowel coarticulation by the self-organizing map.
    Leinonen L; Mujunen R; Kangas J; Torkkola K
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1993; 45(4):173-81. PubMed ID: 8406267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static features in real-time recognition of isolated vowels at high pitch.
    Ferreira AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2389-404. PubMed ID: 17902873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonetically trained models for speaker recognition.
    Rodríguez-Liñares L; Garciá-Mateo C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):385-9. PubMed ID: 11206167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic correlates of the front/back vowel distinction: a comparison of transition onset versus "steady state".
    Sussman HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 2380450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speaker normalization of static and dynamic vowel spectral features.
    Zahorian SA; Jagharghi AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 1880302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic analysis of the voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch tracheoesophageal speech.
    Jongmans P; Wempe TG; van Tinteren H; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):284-97. PubMed ID: 20360458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on the acoustic properties and recognition of speech sounds in Mandarin Chinese.
    Yang J; Qian J; Chen X; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; von Buol A; Li Y; Ren C; Liu B; Xu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Mar; 143(3):1578. PubMed ID: 29604675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
    Silbert N; de Jong K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative contributions of speaking fundamental frequency and formant frequencies to gender identification based on isolated vowels.
    Gelfer MP; Mikos VA
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):544-54. PubMed ID: 16301101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of formant-like features on an automatic vowel classification task.
    de Wet F; Weber K; Boves L; Cranen B; Bengio S; Bourlard H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Sep; 116(3):1781-92. PubMed ID: 15478445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels.
    Zahorian SA; Jagharghi AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):1966-82. PubMed ID: 8227741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A narrow band pattern-matching model of vowel perception.
    Hillenbrand JM; Houde RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1044-55. PubMed ID: 12597197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: implications for the role of auditory feedback.
    Waldstein RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2099-114. PubMed ID: 2269726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.