These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19602803)

  • 1. [Measurement of residual effect in the amorphous selenium flat panel detector system].
    Nishijima K; Ueda K; Kudomi S; Sanada T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Jun; 65(6):782-7. PubMed ID: 19602803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ghosting caused by bulk charge trapping in direct conversion flat-panel detectors using amorphous selenium.
    Zhao W; DeCrescenzo G; Kasap SO; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 15789596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The x-ray time of flight method for investigation of ghosting in amorphous selenium-based flat panel medical x-ray imagers.
    Rau AW; Bakueva L; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3160-77. PubMed ID: 16279070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lag measurement in an a-Se active matrix flat-panel imager.
    Schroeder C; Stanescu T; Rathee S; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1203-9. PubMed ID: 15191310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality and radiation dose on digital chest imaging: comparison of amorphous silicon and amorphous selenium flat-panel systems.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Vereecken L; De Hauwere A; Duyck P; De Man R; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 16928923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector -- a study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization].
    Lehnert T; Wohlers J; Streng W; Manegold K; Wetter A; Jacobi V; Mack MG; Vogl TJ
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 16508834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector.
    Zhao W; Ji WG; Debrie A; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):254-63. PubMed ID: 12607843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Plasma technology and its use in flat panel digital radiography.
    Zur A
    Radiol Manage; 2010; 32(2):10-3. PubMed ID: 22279712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction in chest radiography using a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector.
    Hosch WP; Fink C; Radeleff B; kampschulte a A; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Oct; 57(10):902-7. PubMed ID: 12413914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of depth dependent avalanche noise.
    Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):976-86. PubMed ID: 17441244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of amorphous selenium detector thickness on dual-energy digital breast imaging.
    Hu YH; Zhao W
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111904. PubMed ID: 25370637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of basic imaging properties for digital radiographic systems based on a direct conversion type of flat panel detector].
    Sakai S; Katayama R; Morishita J; Sakaguchi T; Ohkubo S; Maeda T; Hayabuchi N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Jan; 64(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.
    Völk M; Strotzer M; Gmeinwieser J; Alexander J; Fründ R; Seitz J; Manke C; Spahn M; Feuerbach S
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):373-7. PubMed ID: 9228601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography.
    Stone MF; Zhao W; Jacak BV; O'Connor P; Yu B; Rehak P
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 11929014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Radiation exposure in full-field digital mammography with a selenium flat-panel detector].
    Gosch D; Jendrass S; Scholz M; Kahn T
    Rofo; 2006 Jul; 178(7):693-7. PubMed ID: 16761214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
    Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Difference in dose area product between analog image intensifier and digital flat panel detector in peripheral angiography and the effect of BMI.
    Wiesinger B; Kirchner S; Blumenstock G; Herz K; Schmehl J; Claussen CD; Wiskirchen J
    Rofo; 2013 Feb; 185(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 23196837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector.
    Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M
    Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. X-ray imaging using avalanche multiplication in amorphous selenium: investigation of intrinsic avalanche noise.
    Hunt DC; Tanioka K; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2007 Dec; 34(12):4654-63. PubMed ID: 18196793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Physical imaging properties of a flat panel X-ray detector system].
    Yoshida A; Nakamura S; Nishihara S; Kohama C; Takahata A; Fujikawa K
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 12766270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.