These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19603259)

  • 1. The NODS-CLiP: a rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling.
    Toce-Gerstein M; Gerstein DR; Volberg RA
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):541-55. PubMed ID: 19603259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community.
    Toce-Gerstein M; Gerstein DR; Volberg RA
    Addiction; 2003 Dec; 98(12):1661-72. PubMed ID: 14651495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychometric evaluation of the NORC diagnostic screen for gambling problems (NODS) for the assessment of DSM-5 gambling disorder.
    Brazeau BW; Hodgins DC
    Addict Behav; 2022 Jul; 130():107310. PubMed ID: 35325637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using the NORC DSM Screen for Gambling Problems as an outcome measure for pathological gambling: psychometric evaluation.
    Hodgins DC
    Addict Behav; 2004 Nov; 29(8):1685-90. PubMed ID: 15451138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for problem gambling within mental health services: a comparison of the classification accuracy of brief instruments.
    Dowling NA; Merkouris SS; Manning V; Volberg R; Lee SJ; Rodda SN; Lubman DI
    Addiction; 2018 Jun; 113(6):1088-1104. PubMed ID: 29274182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Validity of Three Instruments (DSM-IV, CPGI, and PPGM) in the Assessment of Problem Gambling in South Korea.
    Back KJ; Williams RJ; Lee CK
    J Gambl Stud; 2015 Sep; 31(3):775-86. PubMed ID: 24420959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health Outcomes in Individuals with Problem and Pathological Gambling: An Analysis of the 2014 North Carolina Behavioral Risk Factor Survey System (BRFSS).
    Van Patten R; Weinstock J; McGrath AB
    J Gambl Stud; 2018 Mar; 34(1):297-306. PubMed ID: 28864873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimizing DSM-IV-TR classification accuracy: a brief biosocial screen for detecting current gambling disorders among gamblers in the general household population.
    Gebauer L; LaBrie R; Shaffer HJ
    Can J Psychiatry; 2010 Feb; 55(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 20181303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identification of Gambling Problems in Primary Care: Properties of the NODS-CLiP Screening Tool.
    Cowlishaw S; McCambridge J; Kessler D
    J Addict Med; 2018; 12(6):442-446. PubMed ID: 29944480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
    Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of problem gambling in a Chinese context: the Chinese G-MAP.
    Shek DT; Chan EM
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2009 Jul; 9():548-56. PubMed ID: 19578712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Victorian Gambling Screen: reliability and validation in a clinical population.
    Tolchard B; Battersby MW
    J Gambl Stud; 2010 Dec; 26(4):623-38. PubMed ID: 20035440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric evaluation of the National Opinion Research Center DSM-IV Screen for Gambling Problems (NODS).
    Wickwire EM; Burke RS; Brown SA; Parker JD; May RK
    Am J Addict; 2008; 17(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 18770081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
    de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
    J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stages of change, clinical presentation, retention, and treatment outcomes in treatment-seeking outpatient problem gambling clients.
    Soberay AD; Grimsley P; Faragher JM; Barbash M; Berger B
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2014 Jun; 28(2):414-9. PubMed ID: 24955666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender Differences in Gambling Exposure and At-risk Gambling Behavior.
    Carneiro E; Tavares H; Sanches M; Pinsky I; Caetano R; Zaleski M; Laranjeira R
    J Gambl Stud; 2020 Jun; 36(2):445-457. PubMed ID: 31471835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of brief screens for gambling disorder in the substance use treatment setting.
    Himelhoch SS; Miles-McLean H; Medoff DR; Kreyenbuhl J; Rugle L; Bailey-Kloch M; Potts W; Welsh C; Brownley J
    Am J Addict; 2015 Aug; 24(5):460-6. PubMed ID: 25963048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Gambling Diagnostic Criteria Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 on Mental Disorder Comorbidity Across Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults in a Nationally Representative Sample.
    Nicholson R; Mackenzie C; Afifi TO; Sareen J
    J Gambl Stud; 2019 Mar; 35(1):307-320. PubMed ID: 30167940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gambling screens: does shortening the time frame affect their psychometric properties?
    Wulfert E; Hartley J; Lee M; Wang N; Franco C; Sodano R
    J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(4):521-36. PubMed ID: 16311880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of Instruments Measuring At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Young Individuals: A Systematic Review Covering Years 2009-2015.
    Edgren R; Castrén S; Mäkelä M; Pörtfors P; Alho H; Salonen AH
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jun; 58(6):600-15. PubMed ID: 27151759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.