171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19603669)
1. Evaluation of SBRC-gastric and SBRC-intestinal methods for the prediction of in vivo relative lead bioavailability in contaminated soils.
Juhasz AL; Weber J; Smith E; Naidu R; Marschner B; Rees M; Rofe A; Kuchel T; Sansom L
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4503-9. PubMed ID: 19603669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo-in vitro and XANES spectroscopy assessments of lead bioavailability in contaminated periurban soils.
Smith E; Kempson IM; Juhasz AL; Weber J; Rofe A; Gancarz D; Naidu R; McLaren RG; Gräfe M
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):6145-52. PubMed ID: 21707121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lead bioaccessibility in 12 contaminated soils from China: Correlation to lead relative bioavailability and lead in different fractions.
Li J; Li K; Cave M; Li HB; Ma LQ
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Sep; 295():55-62. PubMed ID: 25911623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of lead bioaccessibility in peri-urban contaminated soils.
Smith E; Weber J; Naidu R; McLaren RG; Juhasz AL
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(1):300-5. PubMed ID: 21115224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting lead relative bioavailability in peri-urban contaminated soils using in vitro bioaccessibility assays.
Juhasz AL; Smith E; Weber J; Rees M; Kuchel T; Rofe A; Sansom L; Naidu R
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2013; 48(6):604-11. PubMed ID: 23442111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of four commonly employed in vitro arsenic bioaccessibility assays for predicting in vivo relative arsenic bioavailability in contaminated soils.
Juhasz AL; Weber J; Smith E; Naidu R; Rees M; Rofe A; Kuchel T; Sansom L
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9487-94. PubMed ID: 20000545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between Pb relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility in phosphate amended soil: Uncertainty associated with predicting Pb immobilization efficacy using in vitro assays.
Kastury F; Placitu S; Boland J; Karna RR; Scheckel KG; Smith E; Juhasz AL
Environ Int; 2019 Oct; 131():104967. PubMed ID: 31284111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of phosphate amendment on relative bioavailability and bioaccessibility of lead and arsenic in contaminated soils.
Li SW; Liu X; Sun HJ; Li MY; Zhao D; Luo J; Li HB; Ma LQ
J Hazard Mater; 2017 Oct; 339():256-263. PubMed ID: 28654790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using the SBRC Assay to Predict Lead Relative Bioavailability in Urban Soils: Contaminant Source and Correlation Model.
Li HB; Zhao D; Li J; Li SW; Wang N; Juhasz AL; Zhu YG; Ma LQ
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 May; 50(10):4989-96. PubMed ID: 27093348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the predictive capabilities of the Sbrc-G in vitro assay for estimating arsenic relative bioavailability in contaminated soils.
Juhasz AL; Herde P; Herde C; Boland J; Smith E
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12962-9. PubMed ID: 25310703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of in vitro lead bioaccessibility in house dust and its relationship to in vivo lead relative bioavailability.
Li HB; Cui XY; Li K; Li J; Juhasz AL; Ma LQ
Environ Sci Technol; 2014; 48(15):8548-55. PubMed ID: 24968149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of in vitro assay pH and extractant composition on As bioaccessibility in contaminated soils.
Smith E; Scheckel K; Miller BW; Weber J; Juhasz AL
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():171-7. PubMed ID: 24369295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying statistical relationships between commonly used in vitro models for estimating lead bioaccessibility.
Yan K; Dong Z; Liu Y; Naidu R
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(7):6873-82. PubMed ID: 26670029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determination of cadmium relative bioavailability in contaminated soils and its prediction using in vitro methodologies.
Juhasz AL; Weber J; Naidu R; Gancarz D; Rofe A; Todor D; Smith E
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jul; 44(13):5240-7. PubMed ID: 20527788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability associated with as in vivo-in vitro correlations when using different bioaccessibility methodologies.
Juhasz AL; Smith E; Nelson C; Thomas DJ; Bradham K
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11646-53. PubMed ID: 25157927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Remediation of Pb-contaminated soil using modified bauxite refinery residue.
Burton ED; Lamb DT; Hamilton J; Miller G; Johnston SG; Karimian N
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Sep; 437():129339. PubMed ID: 35709620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of cadmium bioaccessibility to predict its bioavailability in contaminated soils.
Li SW; Sun HJ; Li HB; Luo J; Ma LQ
Environ Int; 2016 Sep; 94():600-606. PubMed ID: 27346741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can in vitro assays account for interactions between inorganic co-contaminants observed during in vivo relative bioavailability assessment?
Ollson CJ; Smith E; Juhasz AL
Environ Pollut; 2018 Feb; 233():348-355. PubMed ID: 29096308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of arsenic bioaccessibility in housedust and contaminated soils based on four in vitro assays.
Li HB; Li J; Zhu YG; Juhasz AL; Ma LQ
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Nov; 532():803-11. PubMed ID: 26136157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transformation and bioaccessibility of lead induced by steamed bread feed in the gastrointestinal tract.
Kan J; Sima J; Cao X
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Mar; 137():158-164. PubMed ID: 27930968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
