These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19603708)

  • 1. Microfiltration membrane plant start up: a case study with autopsy and permeability recovery analysis.
    Porcelli N; Hillis P; Judd S
    Environ Technol; 2009 May; 30(6):629-39. PubMed ID: 19603708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: The cost benefit of optimisation.
    Porcelli N; Judd S
    Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(5):1389-98. PubMed ID: 20031188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of fouling characteristics of two different poly-vinylidene fluoride microfiltration membranes in a pilot-scale drinking water treatment system using pre-coagulation/sedimentation, sand filtration, and chlorination.
    Chae SR; Yamamura H; Ikeda K; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2008 Apr; 42(8-9):2029-42. PubMed ID: 18242659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of various chemical cleaning conditions for pressured MF process.
    Lee CK; Park C; Choi JS; Kim JO
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Mar; 75(5-6):1063-1070. PubMed ID: 28272036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bacterial growth through microfiltration membranes and NOM characteristics in an MF-RO integrated membrane system: Lab-scale and full-scale studies.
    Park JW; Lee YJ; Meyer AS; Douterelo I; Maeng SK
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():36-45. PubMed ID: 30014977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM).
    Lee N; Amy G; Croué JP; Buisson H
    Water Res; 2004 Dec; 38(20):4511-23. PubMed ID: 15556226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking inorganic foulants irreversibly accumulated on low-pressure membranes for treating surface water.
    Yamamura H; Kimura K; Higuchi K; Watanabe Y; Ding Q; Hafuka A
    Water Res; 2015 Dec; 87():218-24. PubMed ID: 26414890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-stage biofilm-MBR for nitrogen removal and enhanced membrane performance.
    Sun C; Leiknes T
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 22744690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct sewage up-concentration by submerged aerated and vibrated membranes.
    Mezohegyi G; Bilad MR; Vankelecom IF
    Bioresour Technol; 2012 Aug; 118():1-7. PubMed ID: 22695138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of nanofiltration membrane foulants.
    Her N; Amy G; Plottu-Pecheux A; Yoon Y
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3936-47. PubMed ID: 17572472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hybridized photocatalysis-microfiltration system with iron oxide-coated membranes for the removal of natural organic matter in water treatment: effects of iron oxide layers and colloids.
    Yao P; Choo KH; Kim MH
    Water Res; 2009 Sep; 43(17):4238-48. PubMed ID: 19576613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effect of ozone/coagulation pretreatment on membrane fouling reduction].
    Song YL; Dong BZ; Gao NY; Ma XY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2010 Jul; 31(7):1516-9. PubMed ID: 20825019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The substitution of sand filtration by immersed-UF for surface water treatment: pilot-scale studies.
    Lihua S; Xing L; Guoyu Z; Jie C; Zhe X; Guibai L
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2337-43. PubMed ID: 19901465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems of operation and main reasons for failure of membranes in tertiary treatment systems.
    Lazarova V; Gallego S; García Molina V; Rougé P
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1777-84. PubMed ID: 18547930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aluminum-humic colloid formation during pre-coagulation for membrane water treatment: mechanisms and impacts.
    Wang Z; Teychene B; Chalew TE; Ajmani GS; Zhou T; Huang H; Wu X
    Water Res; 2014 Sep; 61():171-80. PubMed ID: 24911563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of ultrafiltration membrane process combined with coagulation/sedimentation.
    Jang NY; Watanabe Y; Minegishi S
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):209-19. PubMed ID: 16003980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility study of moving-fiber biofilm membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment: process control.
    Phattaranawik J; Leiknes T
    Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2227-34. PubMed ID: 21324506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irreversible fouling of membrane bioreactors due to formation of a non-biofilm gel layer.
    Poorasgari E; Larsen P; Zheng X; Nielsen PH; Keiding K; Christensen ML
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(8):1641-7. PubMed ID: 24759523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of polymer flocculants on coagulation-microfiltration of surface water.
    Wang S; Liu C; Li Q
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4538-46. PubMed ID: 23764603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.