These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19603854)

  • 1. A method for time-varying annoyance rating of aircraft noise.
    Dickson C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19603854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Noise-induced annoyance from transportation noise: short-term responses to a single noise source in a laboratory.
    Kim J; Lim C; Hong J; Lee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):804-14. PubMed ID: 20136203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory acuity for aircraft in real-world ambient environments.
    Hoglund E; Brungart D; Iyer N; Hamil J; Mobley F; Hall J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 20649211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Annoyance from environmental noise across the lifespan.
    Van Gerven PW; Vos H; Van Boxtel MP; Janssen SA; Miedema HM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 19603876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The associations between noise sensitivity, reported physical and mental health, perceived environmental quality, and noise annoyance.
    Schreckenberg D; Griefahn B; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(46):7-16. PubMed ID: 20160386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
    Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure.
    Fidell S; Mestre V; Schomer P; Berry B; Gjestland T; Vallet M; Reid T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):791-806. PubMed ID: 21877795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Policy discourse, people's internal frames, and declared aircraft noise annoyance: an application of Q-methodology.
    Kroesen M; Bröer C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 19603877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining the direction of causality between psychological factors and aircraft noise annoyance.
    Kroesen M; Molin EJ; van Wee B
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(46):17-25. PubMed ID: 20160387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.
    Kasess CH; Noll A; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1071-81. PubMed ID: 23927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age and background noise on processing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex sound.
    Alain C; McDonald K; Van Roon P
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):126-35. PubMed ID: 22101023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Annoyance response to recorded aircraft noise. I. Effect of intensity of illumination.
    Shigehisa T; Gunn WJ
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jul; 18(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 755813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China.
    Guoqing D; Xiaoyi L; Xiang S; Zhengguang L; Qili L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(57):52-7. PubMed ID: 22517304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring subjective response to aircraft noise: the effects of survey context.
    Kroesen M; Molin EJ; van Wee B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 23297898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined effect of noise and vibration produced by high-speed trains on annoyance in buildings.
    Lee PJ; Griffin MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 23556582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual constancy in auditory perception of distance to railway tracks.
    De Coensel B; Nilsson ME; Berglund B; Brown AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):474-80. PubMed ID: 23862822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.