BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19603878)

  • 1. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating airborne sound insulation in terms of speech intelligibility.
    Park HK; Bradley JS; Gover BN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1458-71. PubMed ID: 18345835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises--implications for speech masking design.
    Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 25786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimized single-number quantity for rating the airborne sound insulation of constructions: Living sounds.
    Virjonen P; Hongisto V; Oliva D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4428. PubMed ID: 28040024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
    Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
    Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mapping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation.
    Kumar S; Forster HM; Bailey P; Griffiths TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3810-7. PubMed ID: 19206807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Loudness growth of musically complex stimuli.
    Marshall L
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 7345056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using beamforming and binaural synthesis for the psychoacoustical evaluation of target sources in noise.
    Song W; Ellermeier W; Hald J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):910-24. PubMed ID: 18247894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A feasibility study of predictable and unpredictable surf-like sounds for tinnitus therapy using personal music players.
    Durai M; Kobayashi K; Searchfield GD
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):707-713. PubMed ID: 29806782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnitude estimation scaling of the loudness of a wide range of auditory stimuli.
    Fucci D; Petrosino L; McColl D; Wyatt D; Wilcox C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Dec; 85(3 Pt 1):1059-66. PubMed ID: 9399319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examining the short term effects of emotion under an Adaptation Level Theory model of tinnitus perception.
    Durai M; O'Keeffe MG; Searchfield GD
    Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():23-29. PubMed ID: 28027920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.